Effects and health risk assessments of different spray disinfectants on microbial aerosols in chicken houses

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Huaxuan Zhao, Shangmin Li, Junhua Pu, Hongzhi Wang, Huiyong Zhang, Guohui Li, Liang Qu, Xinhong Dou
{"title":"Effects and health risk assessments of different spray disinfectants on microbial aerosols in chicken houses","authors":"Huaxuan Zhao,&nbsp;Shangmin Li,&nbsp;Junhua Pu,&nbsp;Hongzhi Wang,&nbsp;Huiyong Zhang,&nbsp;Guohui Li,&nbsp;Liang Qu,&nbsp;Xinhong Dou","doi":"10.1016/j.psj.2025.105083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to explore the effects of spray processes with four different disinfectants on airborne culturable and pathogenic microbial concentrations, microbial community compositions and health risk assessments in chicken houses. Results indicate that compared to the microbial concentrations before spraying, hypochlorous acid, glutaraldehyde-decamethonium bromide and sodium dichloroisocyanate increase culturable bacteria, culturable fungi, airborne <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Candida albicans</em>, respectively. Beyond that, the spray processes with different disinfectants have no significant effects on the microbial concentrations. The total relative abundances (RAs) of the screened out 46 pathogenic bacterial genera decrease after spraying with povidone iodine, while increase after spraying with the other three disinfectants, which is opposite for the 35 pathogenic fungal genera. The core bacterial or fungal genera principally interrelate with each other through cooperation. Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) concentrations, relative humidity (RH) and temperature (T) influence bacterial communities in aerosols; while fungal communities are mainly affected by T, particulate matters and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) concentrations. Long-term exposure to aerosols in chicken houses have potential adverse effects on human health and the spray processes with different disinfectants exacerbate the health risks of aerosols via inhalation. Hence, different spray disinfectants cannot significantly reduce the microbial aerosols in real chicken farm environments and the cleaning procedures should be comprehensively reviewed and optimized in livestock and poultry farms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20459,"journal":{"name":"Poultry Science","volume":"104 5","pages":"Article 105083"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125003220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the effects of spray processes with four different disinfectants on airborne culturable and pathogenic microbial concentrations, microbial community compositions and health risk assessments in chicken houses. Results indicate that compared to the microbial concentrations before spraying, hypochlorous acid, glutaraldehyde-decamethonium bromide and sodium dichloroisocyanate increase culturable bacteria, culturable fungi, airborne Staphylococcus and Candida albicans, respectively. Beyond that, the spray processes with different disinfectants have no significant effects on the microbial concentrations. The total relative abundances (RAs) of the screened out 46 pathogenic bacterial genera decrease after spraying with povidone iodine, while increase after spraying with the other three disinfectants, which is opposite for the 35 pathogenic fungal genera. The core bacterial or fungal genera principally interrelate with each other through cooperation. Ammonia (NH3) concentrations, relative humidity (RH) and temperature (T) influence bacterial communities in aerosols; while fungal communities are mainly affected by T, particulate matters and nitrous oxide (N2O) concentrations. Long-term exposure to aerosols in chicken houses have potential adverse effects on human health and the spray processes with different disinfectants exacerbate the health risks of aerosols via inhalation. Hence, different spray disinfectants cannot significantly reduce the microbial aerosols in real chicken farm environments and the cleaning procedures should be comprehensively reviewed and optimized in livestock and poultry farms.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Poultry Science
Poultry Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
94 days
期刊介绍: First self-published in 1921, Poultry Science is an internationally renowned monthly journal, known as the authoritative source for a broad range of poultry information and high-caliber research. The journal plays a pivotal role in the dissemination of preeminent poultry-related knowledge across all disciplines. As of January 2020, Poultry Science will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers. An international journal, Poultry Science publishes original papers, research notes, symposium papers, and reviews of basic science as applied to poultry. This authoritative source of poultry information is consistently ranked by ISI Impact Factor as one of the top 10 agriculture, dairy and animal science journals to deliver high-caliber research. Currently it is the highest-ranked (by Impact Factor and Eigenfactor) journal dedicated to publishing poultry research. Subject areas include breeding, genetics, education, production, management, environment, health, behavior, welfare, immunology, molecular biology, metabolism, nutrition, physiology, reproduction, processing, and products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信