Synergies and trade-offs between environmental impacts and farm profitability: The case of pasture-based dairy production systems

IF 4.8 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Philipp Mennig, Zita Szigeti
{"title":"Synergies and trade-offs between environmental impacts and farm profitability: The case of pasture-based dairy production systems","authors":"Philipp Mennig,&nbsp;Zita Szigeti","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agriculture plays an essential role in pushing the Earth system toward, or even beyond, the boundaries of a safe operating space for humanity. Farms thus need to decrease the environmental footprint of their operations dramatically. In order to identify strategies that support farmers on this path, many studies use mass flow simulation or optimization models. However, they do not account for “real farm practices” and typically focus on a specific environmental category only, mainly on greenhouse gas emissions. By doing so, they ignore potential trade-off or synergetic relations between environmental impact categories. Furthermore, most of these studies ignore farm-level economic effects. From a farmer's perspective, however, it is crucial that mechanisms to decrease environmental impacts have a positive effect on farm profitability. Against this background, we conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment including the impact categories climate change (with and without carbon sequestration), terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, land occupation, water use, fossil depletion and biodiversity and additionally estimate farm profitability. Based on farm characteristics and management practices, we explore factors that jointly affect environmental impacts and profitability of dairy farms. To this end, a detailed high-quality dataset including site- and farm-specific variables of seven organic pasture-based dairy farms located in Southern Bavaria, Germany, for the year 2021 was used to conduct a cradle-to-farm gate attributional life cycle assessment. Our results suggest that the sample farms perform comparatively well in most environmental categories and that trade-offs between different categories and farm profitability exist. While we could not identify a one-fits-all solution, i.e. farm characteristics or management practices that minimize environmental impacts in all categories and maximize profit at the same time, we were able to determine some joint levers. A low level of or no concentrate feeding respectively as well as not farming wetlands, applying low fertilizer rates and pursuing low replacement rates with high lifetime daily yields were identified as win-win solutions for almost all categories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101798"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325001693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agriculture plays an essential role in pushing the Earth system toward, or even beyond, the boundaries of a safe operating space for humanity. Farms thus need to decrease the environmental footprint of their operations dramatically. In order to identify strategies that support farmers on this path, many studies use mass flow simulation or optimization models. However, they do not account for “real farm practices” and typically focus on a specific environmental category only, mainly on greenhouse gas emissions. By doing so, they ignore potential trade-off or synergetic relations between environmental impact categories. Furthermore, most of these studies ignore farm-level economic effects. From a farmer's perspective, however, it is crucial that mechanisms to decrease environmental impacts have a positive effect on farm profitability. Against this background, we conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment including the impact categories climate change (with and without carbon sequestration), terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, land occupation, water use, fossil depletion and biodiversity and additionally estimate farm profitability. Based on farm characteristics and management practices, we explore factors that jointly affect environmental impacts and profitability of dairy farms. To this end, a detailed high-quality dataset including site- and farm-specific variables of seven organic pasture-based dairy farms located in Southern Bavaria, Germany, for the year 2021 was used to conduct a cradle-to-farm gate attributional life cycle assessment. Our results suggest that the sample farms perform comparatively well in most environmental categories and that trade-offs between different categories and farm profitability exist. While we could not identify a one-fits-all solution, i.e. farm characteristics or management practices that minimize environmental impacts in all categories and maximize profit at the same time, we were able to determine some joint levers. A low level of or no concentrate feeding respectively as well as not farming wetlands, applying low fertilizer rates and pursuing low replacement rates with high lifetime daily yields were identified as win-win solutions for almost all categories.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信