The impact of site-specific soil-test-based extension advice on farm management in Malawi

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Christone J. Nyondo , Joyce Minofu , Joseph Goeb , William J. Burke , Daemon Kambewa , Regis Chikowo , Sieglinde Snapp
{"title":"The impact of site-specific soil-test-based extension advice on farm management in Malawi","authors":"Christone J. Nyondo ,&nbsp;Joyce Minofu ,&nbsp;Joseph Goeb ,&nbsp;William J. Burke ,&nbsp;Daemon Kambewa ,&nbsp;Regis Chikowo ,&nbsp;Sieglinde Snapp","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural extension services in Africa face many challenges in reaching farmers with information for sustainable and improved crop production. A critical gap for many smallholders is a lack of knowledge of their soils, including soil organic carbon (SOC) content, a key soil health indicator driving fertiliser responsiveness and crop production. We use a randomised control trial (RCT) to estimate the causal effects of real-time diagnostics and soil carbon measurement to support behavioural change and farmers’ adaptive capacity to improve farm management practices. Treatment group farmers receive context-specific extension services through site-specific soil tests using a handheld reflectometer as a starting point for in-depth discussions with extension agents about soil management. The results suggest significant improvements in sustainable intensification within the treatment group, with gains in farmer experimentation and adoption of organic inputs and management practices in both the year of advice and one year later. Treatment farmers are 40 percent more likely to apply organic fertilisers, 18 percent more likely to incorporate crop residues into their soils, and 7 percent more likely to intercrop maize with a legume. Further, treatment farmers show better timing of inorganic fertiliser applications, though use decisions are largely unchanged. The widespread fertiliser subsidy program may have influenced this last finding. This research demonstrates that a low-cost soil testing tool combined with individualised soil management advice can influence farmers’ soil nutrient-management behaviours and improve the capacity of extension to deliver site-specific soil information. This can lead to marked improvements in the effectiveness of farm management practices and agricultural extension services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 102850"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural extension services in Africa face many challenges in reaching farmers with information for sustainable and improved crop production. A critical gap for many smallholders is a lack of knowledge of their soils, including soil organic carbon (SOC) content, a key soil health indicator driving fertiliser responsiveness and crop production. We use a randomised control trial (RCT) to estimate the causal effects of real-time diagnostics and soil carbon measurement to support behavioural change and farmers’ adaptive capacity to improve farm management practices. Treatment group farmers receive context-specific extension services through site-specific soil tests using a handheld reflectometer as a starting point for in-depth discussions with extension agents about soil management. The results suggest significant improvements in sustainable intensification within the treatment group, with gains in farmer experimentation and adoption of organic inputs and management practices in both the year of advice and one year later. Treatment farmers are 40 percent more likely to apply organic fertilisers, 18 percent more likely to incorporate crop residues into their soils, and 7 percent more likely to intercrop maize with a legume. Further, treatment farmers show better timing of inorganic fertiliser applications, though use decisions are largely unchanged. The widespread fertiliser subsidy program may have influenced this last finding. This research demonstrates that a low-cost soil testing tool combined with individualised soil management advice can influence farmers’ soil nutrient-management behaviours and improve the capacity of extension to deliver site-specific soil information. This can lead to marked improvements in the effectiveness of farm management practices and agricultural extension services.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信