Sana Jahangir , Will Bosch , Amir Esrafilian , Mika E. Mononen , Petri Tanska , Lauri Stenroth , Marius Henriksen , Tine Alkjær , Rami K. Korhonen
{"title":"Effect of uncertainties in musculoskeletal modeling inputs on sensitivity of knee joint finite element simulations","authors":"Sana Jahangir , Will Bosch , Amir Esrafilian , Mika E. Mononen , Petri Tanska , Lauri Stenroth , Marius Henriksen , Tine Alkjær , Rami K. Korhonen","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Musculoskeletal finite element modeling is used to estimate mechanical responses of knee joint tissues but involves uncertainties in muscle activations, marker locations, cartilage stiffness, maximum isometric forces, and gait parameter personalization. This study investigates how these uncertainties affect cartilage mechanical responses in knee joint finite element models during walking. We selected three subjects and constructed five musculoskeletal models for each, representing different variations of modeling assumptions, along with a reference model using conventional assumptions. We then ran finite element simulations of knee joints using both personalized gait inputs (motion and loading boundary conditions) and non-personalized gait inputs from literature. Our results demonstrated that varying modeling assumptions, such as optimization function for muscle activation patterns, knee marker position, knee cartilage stiffness, and maximum isometric force, produced highly subject-specific effects. Differences between the reference and altered models ranged from 3% to 30% in musculoskeletal modeling and from 1% to 61% in finite element modeling results. The largest effects occurred with non-personalized gait data, resulting in up to 6- and 2-fold changes in musculoskeletal and finite element modeling results, respectively. This study highlights the sensitivity of knee mechanics to different modeling assumptions and underscores the importance of applying personalized gait parameters for accurate finite element simulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325000323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Musculoskeletal finite element modeling is used to estimate mechanical responses of knee joint tissues but involves uncertainties in muscle activations, marker locations, cartilage stiffness, maximum isometric forces, and gait parameter personalization. This study investigates how these uncertainties affect cartilage mechanical responses in knee joint finite element models during walking. We selected three subjects and constructed five musculoskeletal models for each, representing different variations of modeling assumptions, along with a reference model using conventional assumptions. We then ran finite element simulations of knee joints using both personalized gait inputs (motion and loading boundary conditions) and non-personalized gait inputs from literature. Our results demonstrated that varying modeling assumptions, such as optimization function for muscle activation patterns, knee marker position, knee cartilage stiffness, and maximum isometric force, produced highly subject-specific effects. Differences between the reference and altered models ranged from 3% to 30% in musculoskeletal modeling and from 1% to 61% in finite element modeling results. The largest effects occurred with non-personalized gait data, resulting in up to 6- and 2-fold changes in musculoskeletal and finite element modeling results, respectively. This study highlights the sensitivity of knee mechanics to different modeling assumptions and underscores the importance of applying personalized gait parameters for accurate finite element simulations.
期刊介绍:
Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.