The Use of Questioning Strategies in the Development of Critical Thinking Skills in Children: A Qualitative Study of the Socratic Method

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kübra Kanat, Zeynep Fulya Temel
{"title":"The Use of Questioning Strategies in the Development of Critical Thinking Skills in Children: A Qualitative Study of the Socratic Method","authors":"Kübra Kanat, Zeynep Fulya Temel","doi":"10.1007/s10643-025-01864-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study examined the use of the Socratic method in developing children’s critical thinking skills. Accordingly, the study group consisted of fifteen 5–6 year-old kindergarteners along with their 2 teachers. The study is a case design study which is one of the qualitative research methods. A Socratic method-based education program prepared by the researchers was implemented twice a week for 10 weeks. The research data were obtained via “Demographic Information Form”, “Interview Form” and “Video Recordings”. In the analysis of the data, content analysis was performed using the NVIVO 12 Plus program. Themes, subthemes and categories were formed depending on the coding. As a result of the study, two themes were obtained. Namely, critical thinking behaviors and non-critical thinking behaviors, and categories related to these themes were generated. When the program implemented in the study was examined, the frequency of children’s critical thinking behaviors increased from the first quarter to the fourth quarter, while the frequency of children’s behaviors not directed towards critical thinking decreased from the first quarter to the fourth one. According to the results of the research, which were also supported by the teachers’ opinions, it was concluded that the education program prepared according to the Socratic method had a positive contribution to the development of critical thinking skills of 5–6 year old children. It can be said that the Socratic method can be used in early childhood education to improve children’s critical thinking abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01864-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined the use of the Socratic method in developing children’s critical thinking skills. Accordingly, the study group consisted of fifteen 5–6 year-old kindergarteners along with their 2 teachers. The study is a case design study which is one of the qualitative research methods. A Socratic method-based education program prepared by the researchers was implemented twice a week for 10 weeks. The research data were obtained via “Demographic Information Form”, “Interview Form” and “Video Recordings”. In the analysis of the data, content analysis was performed using the NVIVO 12 Plus program. Themes, subthemes and categories were formed depending on the coding. As a result of the study, two themes were obtained. Namely, critical thinking behaviors and non-critical thinking behaviors, and categories related to these themes were generated. When the program implemented in the study was examined, the frequency of children’s critical thinking behaviors increased from the first quarter to the fourth quarter, while the frequency of children’s behaviors not directed towards critical thinking decreased from the first quarter to the fourth one. According to the results of the research, which were also supported by the teachers’ opinions, it was concluded that the education program prepared according to the Socratic method had a positive contribution to the development of critical thinking skills of 5–6 year old children. It can be said that the Socratic method can be used in early childhood education to improve children’s critical thinking abilities.

问题策略在儿童批判性思维技能发展中的应用:苏格拉底方法的定性研究
本研究考察了苏格拉底方法在培养儿童批判性思维技能中的应用。因此,研究小组由15名5-6岁的幼儿园儿童和他们的2名老师组成。本研究采用定性研究方法之一的案例设计研究。研究人员准备了一项基于苏格拉底方法的教育计划,每周实施两次,为期10周。研究数据通过“人口统计信息表”、“访谈表”和“录像”获得。在数据分析中,使用NVIVO 12 Plus程序进行内容分析。根据编码形成主题、副主题和类别。作为研究的结果,得到了两个主题。即批判性思维行为和非批判性思维行为,以及与这些主题相关的类别。当研究中实施的计划被检查时,从第一季度到第四季度,儿童批判性思维行为的频率有所增加,而从第一季度到第四季度,儿童非批判性思维行为的频率有所下降。根据研究结果,也得到教师意见的支持,得出结论,根据苏格拉底方法编制的教育方案对5-6岁儿童批判性思维技能的发展有积极的贡献。可以说,苏格拉底法可以应用于幼儿教育中,提高儿童的批判性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Childhood Education Journal
Early Childhood Education Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children. Areas of Emphasis: International studies; Educational programs in diverse settings; Early learning across multiple domains; Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration; Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies; Best practices in early childhood teacher education; Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development; Family, school, and community relationships; Investigations related to curriculum and instruction; Articles that link theory and best practices; Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信