Ronald R Kelly, Gerald P Berent, Erin Finton, Tanya Schueler-Choukairi, Stanley Van Horn, Zhong Chen, Kimberly Persky, Susan Post Rizzo, Kathryn L Schmitz
{"title":"DHH and L2 college students' knowledge of English resultatives and depictives.","authors":"Ronald R Kelly, Gerald P Berent, Erin Finton, Tanya Schueler-Choukairi, Stanley Van Horn, Zhong Chen, Kimberly Persky, Susan Post Rizzo, Kathryn L Schmitz","doi":"10.1093/jdsade/enae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>College-level deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students and hearing students of English as a Second Language (L2) along with hearing native speakers (NS) of English were assessed in their knowledge of English resultative and depictive sentences. In \"Kevin wiped the table clean,\" the resultative phrase \"clean\" indicates that the table became clean as a result of Kevin wiping it. In \"Megan drove the car drunk,\" the depictive phrase \"drunk\" describes Megan's state throughout the entire event of driving. Findings of a sentence-acceptability rating scale task revealed higher performance by the NS group compared to the DHH and L2 groups, whose near-equivalent performance improved with increasing overall English proficiency. Participants exhibited higher performance on active, passive, and unaccusative resultative sentences than on ungrammatical unergative resultatives and higher performance on grammatical than ungrammatical depictive sentence types. These findings contribute new insights into the comparative study of English acquisition by DHH and L2 learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":47768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","volume":"30 2","pages":"226-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jdsade/enae046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
College-level deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students and hearing students of English as a Second Language (L2) along with hearing native speakers (NS) of English were assessed in their knowledge of English resultative and depictive sentences. In "Kevin wiped the table clean," the resultative phrase "clean" indicates that the table became clean as a result of Kevin wiping it. In "Megan drove the car drunk," the depictive phrase "drunk" describes Megan's state throughout the entire event of driving. Findings of a sentence-acceptability rating scale task revealed higher performance by the NS group compared to the DHH and L2 groups, whose near-equivalent performance improved with increasing overall English proficiency. Participants exhibited higher performance on active, passive, and unaccusative resultative sentences than on ungrammatical unergative resultatives and higher performance on grammatical than ungrammatical depictive sentence types. These findings contribute new insights into the comparative study of English acquisition by DHH and L2 learners.
本研究评估了大学水平的聋哑和听力困难学生(DHH)、英语作为第二语言的听力正常学生(L2)以及听力正常的英语母语人士(NS)的英语结果句和描述句知识。在“Kevin wipe the table clean”中,结果短语“clean”表示桌子因为Kevin擦拭而变得干净了。在“Megan driving the car drunk”中,“drunk”这个描述性短语描述了Megan在整个驾驶过程中的状态。一项句子可接受性评定量表任务的研究结果显示,与DHH组和L2组相比,NS组的表现更高,后者的表现随着整体英语熟练程度的提高而提高。参与者在主动、被动和非宾格结果句上比在非语法的非否定结果句上表现得更好,在语法的描述句上比在非语法的描述句上表现得更好。这些发现为DHH和L2学习者的英语习得比较研究提供了新的见解。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal integrating and coordinating basic and applied research relating to individuals who are deaf, including cultural, developmental, linguistic, and educational topics. JDSDE addresses issues of current and future concern to allied fields, encouraging interdisciplinary discussion. The journal promises a forum that is timely, of high quality, and accessible to researchers, educators, and lay audiences. Instructions for contributors appear at the back of each issue.