Subcortical responses to continuous speech under bimodal divided attention.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1152/jn.00039.2025
Zilong Xie
{"title":"Subcortical responses to continuous speech under bimodal divided attention.","authors":"Zilong Xie","doi":"10.1152/jn.00039.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Everyday speech perception often occurs in multimodal environments, requiring listeners to divide attention across sensory modalities to prioritize relevant information. Although this division of attention modestly reduces cortical encoding of natural continuous speech, its impact on subcortical processing remains unclear. To investigate this, we used an audiovisual dual-task paradigm to manipulate bimodal divided attention. Participants completed a primary visual memory task (low or high cognitive load) while simultaneously performing a secondary task of listening to audiobook segments. Sixteen young adults with normal hearing completed these tasks while their EEG signals were recorded. In a third condition, participants performed only the listening task. Subcortical responses to the audiobook segments were analyzed using temporal response functions (TRFs), which predicted EEG responses from speech predictors derived from auditory nerve models. Across all conditions, TRFs displayed a prominent peak at ∼8 ms, resembling the wave V peak of auditory brainstem responses, indicating subcortical origins. No significant differences in latencies or amplitudes of this peak, nor in TRF prediction correlations, were observed between conditions. These findings provide no evidence that bimodal divided attention affects the subcortical processing of continuous speech, indicating that its effects may be restricted to cortical levels.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study shows that auditory subcortical processing of natural continuous speech remains unaffected when attention is divided across auditory and visual modalities. These findings indicate that the influence of crossmodal attention on the processing of natural continuous speech may be restricted to cortical levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1216-1221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00039.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Everyday speech perception often occurs in multimodal environments, requiring listeners to divide attention across sensory modalities to prioritize relevant information. Although this division of attention modestly reduces cortical encoding of natural continuous speech, its impact on subcortical processing remains unclear. To investigate this, we used an audiovisual dual-task paradigm to manipulate bimodal divided attention. Participants completed a primary visual memory task (low or high cognitive load) while simultaneously performing a secondary task of listening to audiobook segments. Sixteen young adults with normal hearing completed these tasks while their EEG signals were recorded. In a third condition, participants performed only the listening task. Subcortical responses to the audiobook segments were analyzed using temporal response functions (TRFs), which predicted EEG responses from speech predictors derived from auditory nerve models. Across all conditions, TRFs displayed a prominent peak at ∼8 ms, resembling the wave V peak of auditory brainstem responses, indicating subcortical origins. No significant differences in latencies or amplitudes of this peak, nor in TRF prediction correlations, were observed between conditions. These findings provide no evidence that bimodal divided attention affects the subcortical processing of continuous speech, indicating that its effects may be restricted to cortical levels.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that auditory subcortical processing of natural continuous speech remains unaffected when attention is divided across auditory and visual modalities. These findings indicate that the influence of crossmodal attention on the processing of natural continuous speech may be restricted to cortical levels.

双峰分散注意下皮层下对连续言语的反应。
日常言语感知通常发生在多模态环境中,这需要听者将注意力分散到不同的感觉模态上,以优先考虑相关信息。虽然这种注意力划分适度地减少了自然连续语音的皮层编码,但其对皮层下加工的影响尚不清楚。为了研究这一点,我们使用了一个视听双任务范式来操纵双峰分散注意。参与者完成了主要的视觉记忆任务(低或高认知负荷),同时进行了听有声读物片段的次要任务。16名听力正常的年轻人完成了这些任务,同时记录了他们的脑电图信号。在第三种情况下,参与者只执行听力任务。使用时间反应函数(TRFs)分析了皮层下对有声读物的反应,该函数预测了来自听觉神经模型的语音预测器的脑电图反应。在所有条件下,TRFs在大约8 ms时出现一个明显的峰值,类似于听觉脑干反应的V波峰值,表明皮层下起源。在不同的条件下,没有观察到该峰的潜伏期或振幅的显著差异,也没有观察到TRF预测相关性。这些发现没有证据表明双峰分散注意力影响连续言语的皮层下加工,表明其影响可能仅限于皮层水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信