Reward invigorates isometric gripping actions.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1152/jn.00384.2024
Rachel M Marbaker, Ryan C Schmad, Razan A Al-Ghamdi, Shruthi Sukumar, Alaa A Ahmed
{"title":"Reward invigorates isometric gripping actions.","authors":"Rachel M Marbaker, Ryan C Schmad, Razan A Al-Ghamdi, Shruthi Sukumar, Alaa A Ahmed","doi":"10.1152/jn.00384.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals exhibit a propensity to move faster toward more rewarding stimuli. Although this phenomenon has been observed in movements, the effect of reward on implicit control of isometric actions, such as gripping or grasping, is relatively unknown. How reward-related invigoration generalizes to other effortful actions is an important question. Reward invigorates reaching movements and saccades, supporting the idea that reward pays the additional effort cost of moving faster. Effort in isometric force generation is less understood, so here we ask whether and how reward-related invigoration generalizes to isometric force gripping. And if so, what implicit characteristics of gripping change when there is a prospect of reward? Participants (<i>n</i> = 19) gripped a force transducer and the force applied was mapped to radial position of an onscreen cursor. Each trial, a target appeared in one of four locations; increasing grip force moved the cursor toward the target. The gripping action was interchangeable for all target positions. In each block of 100 trials, one target was consistently rewarded, whereas the other targets were not. When gripping to acquire the rewarded target, participants reacted faster, generated force more rapidly and to a greater extent, without increasing variance and without increasing the rising force-time integral. These findings support the generalization of reward-related invigoration in isometric force tasks, and that the brain exquisitely trades-off reward and effort costs to obtain reward more rapidly without increasing variance and without more effort costs than necessary.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Gripping actions are important for day-to-day tasks, for medical diagnostics like strength and force control, and for choice selection in decision-making experiments. Comparing isometric gripping responses to reward and nonreward cues, we observed reward-based invigoration mediated by selective increases in effort. These findings can be leveraged to provide additional insight into the decision making process and better understand the effect of reward on movement vigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1282-1294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00384.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals exhibit a propensity to move faster toward more rewarding stimuli. Although this phenomenon has been observed in movements, the effect of reward on implicit control of isometric actions, such as gripping or grasping, is relatively unknown. How reward-related invigoration generalizes to other effortful actions is an important question. Reward invigorates reaching movements and saccades, supporting the idea that reward pays the additional effort cost of moving faster. Effort in isometric force generation is less understood, so here we ask whether and how reward-related invigoration generalizes to isometric force gripping. And if so, what implicit characteristics of gripping change when there is a prospect of reward? Participants (n = 19) gripped a force transducer and the force applied was mapped to radial position of an onscreen cursor. Each trial, a target appeared in one of four locations; increasing grip force moved the cursor toward the target. The gripping action was interchangeable for all target positions. In each block of 100 trials, one target was consistently rewarded, whereas the other targets were not. When gripping to acquire the rewarded target, participants reacted faster, generated force more rapidly and to a greater extent, without increasing variance and without increasing the rising force-time integral. These findings support the generalization of reward-related invigoration in isometric force tasks, and that the brain exquisitely trades-off reward and effort costs to obtain reward more rapidly without increasing variance and without more effort costs than necessary.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Gripping actions are important for day-to-day tasks, for medical diagnostics like strength and force control, and for choice selection in decision-making experiments. Comparing isometric gripping responses to reward and nonreward cues, we observed reward-based invigoration mediated by selective increases in effort. These findings can be leveraged to provide additional insight into the decision making process and better understand the effect of reward on movement vigor.

奖励刺激等距抓握动作。
个体表现出一种倾向,倾向于更快地走向更有益的刺激。虽然这种现象在运动中已经被观察到,但奖励对等距动作(如抓握)的内隐控制的影响却相对未知。与奖励相关的激励如何推广到其他努力行为是一个重要的问题。奖励可以刺激到达动作和扫视,支持奖励支付更快移动的额外努力成本的观点。在等距力产生的努力是不太了解,所以在这里我们问是否和如何奖励相关的激励推广到等距力握力。如果是这样,当有回报的前景时,扣人心弦的变化有什么隐含特征?参与者(N=19)抓住一个力传感器,施加的力被映射到屏幕上光标的径向位置。每次试验,一个目标出现在四个位置中的一个;增加握持力可以将光标移向目标。在所有目标位置上,夹持动作都是可互换的。在每组100个试验中,一个目标始终得到奖励,而另一个目标则没有。当抓握获得奖励目标时,参与者反应更快,产生力的速度更快,程度更大,而不增加方差,也不增加力-时间积分的上升。这些发现支持了在等长力任务中与奖励相关的激励的概括,大脑巧妙地权衡了奖励和努力成本,以更快地获得奖励,而不会增加方差,也不会增加不必要的努力成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信