Expanding Literacy: Caregiver Experiences With Literacy Engagement for Their Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Carly A. Roberts, Alison Wilhelm, Bailey Allred, Roxanne F. Hudson
{"title":"Expanding Literacy: Caregiver Experiences With Literacy Engagement for Their Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","authors":"Carly A. Roberts, Alison Wilhelm, Bailey Allred, Roxanne F. Hudson","doi":"10.1177/00144029251317014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, research exploring the literacy experiences of learners with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) has prioritized systematic, multicomponent instruction that emphasizes the development of traditional reading and writing skills. However, this approach may inadvertently facilitate literacy gatekeeping and limit opportunities for literacy learning that focuses on meaning making for students who do not demonstrate specific, conventional reading, writing, and communication skills. To explore conceptions of literacy beyond these traditional frameworks, in this interpretivist, qualitative study, we leveraged a multiliteracies framework and the concept of presumption of competence to interview 24 parents of elementary children with IDD to learn about their child’s literacy engagement, definitions of literacy, and family literacy practices. Our findings highlight how caregivers had traditional framings of literacy when describing their definition of literacy but went on to describe more expansive representations of literacy in their home literacy experiences. These activities went beyond traditional framings of literacy activities for learners with IDD and included: (a) communication and connection, (b) environmental access, (c) embracing music and the arts, and (d) culture and community. Implications for research and practice to improve literacy learning for students with IDD are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029251317014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, research exploring the literacy experiences of learners with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) has prioritized systematic, multicomponent instruction that emphasizes the development of traditional reading and writing skills. However, this approach may inadvertently facilitate literacy gatekeeping and limit opportunities for literacy learning that focuses on meaning making for students who do not demonstrate specific, conventional reading, writing, and communication skills. To explore conceptions of literacy beyond these traditional frameworks, in this interpretivist, qualitative study, we leveraged a multiliteracies framework and the concept of presumption of competence to interview 24 parents of elementary children with IDD to learn about their child’s literacy engagement, definitions of literacy, and family literacy practices. Our findings highlight how caregivers had traditional framings of literacy when describing their definition of literacy but went on to describe more expansive representations of literacy in their home literacy experiences. These activities went beyond traditional framings of literacy activities for learners with IDD and included: (a) communication and connection, (b) environmental access, (c) embracing music and the arts, and (d) culture and community. Implications for research and practice to improve literacy learning for students with IDD are discussed.
扩大读写能力:照顾者对有智力和发育障碍的儿童进行读写参与的经验
从历史上看,探索智力和发育障碍(IDD)学习者的读写经验的研究优先考虑系统的、多成分的教学,强调传统阅读和写作技能的发展。然而,这种方法可能会在不经意间促进扫盲把关,并限制那些不具备特定的传统阅读、写作和沟通技能的学生进行意义建构的扫盲学习的机会。为了探索这些传统框架之外的识字概念,在这项解释主义的定性研究中,我们利用多元识字框架和能力推定的概念,采访了24名缺缺症小学生的父母,以了解他们孩子的识字参与、识字定义和家庭识字实践。我们的研究结果强调了看护者在描述他们对识字的定义时是如何使用传统的识字框架的,但在他们的家庭识字经历中,他们继续描述了更广泛的识字表征。这些活动超出了IDD学习者扫盲活动的传统框架,包括:(a)沟通和联系,(b)环境准入,(c)拥抱音乐和艺术,以及(d)文化和社区。本文讨论了研究和实践对改善IDD学生识字学习的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信