Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Jiaxiang Chen, Xiaoli Shi, Wei Hu, Rongmu Lin, Ligang Meng, Changsheng Liang, Xinggang Ma, Liang Xu
{"title":"Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.","authors":"Jiaxiang Chen, Xiaoli Shi, Wei Hu, Rongmu Lin, Ligang Meng, Changsheng Liang, Xinggang Ma, Liang Xu","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preschool children who received sevoflurane anaesthesia were associated with a high incidence of emergence agitation (EA). Studies have shown that a subanaesthetic dose of propofol (1 mg/kg) at the end of inhalational anaesthesia could reduce EA in paediatric patients, but the optimal administrations are still under investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a double-blind trial, 160 preschool children (ASA I or II, 2-5 years old) undergoing day surgery of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with sevoflurane anaesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups: the control group, single bolus 3 min before the end of the surgery (bolus A), single bolus at the end of the surgery (bolus B) and continuous infusion for 3 min at the end of the surgery (continuous infusion). The dose of propofol in the bolus A group, bolus B group and continued infusion group is 1 mg/kg. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of EA assessed by the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale and Watcha scales. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, emergence time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of EA was as follows: 65.0% in the control group, 30.0% in the bolus A group, 32.5% in the bolus B group and 5.0% in the continuous infusion group (p<0.05). Furthermore, the peak PAED scores in the continuous infusion group were significantly lower than those in the other groups. However, extubation time and emergence time showed no differences among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous infusion of subanaesthetic dose propofol (1 mg/kg) for 3 min at the end of sevoflurane anaesthesia seems to be more appropriate than other administration as it reduced EA and did not prolong the time to wake.</p><p><strong>Trail registration number: </strong>NCT05420402.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preschool children who received sevoflurane anaesthesia were associated with a high incidence of emergence agitation (EA). Studies have shown that a subanaesthetic dose of propofol (1 mg/kg) at the end of inhalational anaesthesia could reduce EA in paediatric patients, but the optimal administrations are still under investigation.

Methods: In a double-blind trial, 160 preschool children (ASA I or II, 2-5 years old) undergoing day surgery of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with sevoflurane anaesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups: the control group, single bolus 3 min before the end of the surgery (bolus A), single bolus at the end of the surgery (bolus B) and continuous infusion for 3 min at the end of the surgery (continuous infusion). The dose of propofol in the bolus A group, bolus B group and continued infusion group is 1 mg/kg. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of EA assessed by the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale and Watcha scales. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, emergence time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate.

Results: The incidence of EA was as follows: 65.0% in the control group, 30.0% in the bolus A group, 32.5% in the bolus B group and 5.0% in the continuous infusion group (p<0.05). Furthermore, the peak PAED scores in the continuous infusion group were significantly lower than those in the other groups. However, extubation time and emergence time showed no differences among groups.

Conclusions: Continuous infusion of subanaesthetic dose propofol (1 mg/kg) for 3 min at the end of sevoflurane anaesthesia seems to be more appropriate than other administration as it reduced EA and did not prolong the time to wake.

Trail registration number: NCT05420402.

比较亚麻醉异丙酚不同给药方法减轻学龄前儿童日间手术出现躁动:一项双盲,随机对照研究。
背景:学龄前儿童接受七氟醚麻醉与出现性躁动(EA)的高发相关。研究表明,在吸入麻醉结束时使用亚麻醉剂量的异丙酚(1mg /kg)可以减少儿科患者的EA,但最佳给药剂量仍在研究中。方法:采用双盲方法,选取160例接受七氟醚麻醉腹腔镜腹股膜疝修补术日间手术的学龄前儿童(ASA I级或II级,年龄2-5岁),随机分为对照组、手术结束前3分钟单次给药(a组)、手术结束时单次给药(B组)、手术结束后持续输注3分钟(持续输注)4组。A丸组、B丸组和继续输注组丙泊酚的剂量为1mg /kg。主要结局是通过儿科麻醉出现性谵妄(PAED)量表和Watcha量表评估EA的发生率和严重程度。次要结果包括拔管时间、急诊时间、平均动脉压和心率。结果:EA发生率为:对照组65.0%,A丸组30.0%,B丸组32.5%,持续输注组5.0%。结论:七氟醚麻醉结束时持续输注亚麻醉剂量异丙酚(1mg /kg) 3min,可减少EA,且不延长苏醒时间,较其他给药方式更为合适。试验注册号:NCT05420402。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信