The Dice Trails Test: A modified Trail Making Test for children and adults with Down Syndrome

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Katja Sandkühler , Elisabeth Wlasich , Hannah Stadler , Armelle Müller , Lena Heiß , Olivia Wagemann , Georg Nübling , Thomas Schenk , Adrian Danek , Johannes Levin , Sandra V. Loosli
{"title":"The Dice Trails Test: A modified Trail Making Test for children and adults with Down Syndrome","authors":"Katja Sandkühler ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Wlasich ,&nbsp;Hannah Stadler ,&nbsp;Armelle Müller ,&nbsp;Lena Heiß ,&nbsp;Olivia Wagemann ,&nbsp;Georg Nübling ,&nbsp;Thomas Schenk ,&nbsp;Adrian Danek ,&nbsp;Johannes Levin ,&nbsp;Sandra V. Loosli","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychometrically sound instruments to assess cognitive flexibility in people with Down Syndrome (DS) are lacking. The Trail Making Test (TMT) is well-established but requires reading letters and numerals, limiting its applicability for people with DS.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To evaluate the psychometric properties and developmental sensitivity of a newly developed TMT adaptation without letters and numerals – the Dice Trails Test (DTT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The DTT was administered to 39 children (8–14 years, 46 % female) and 57 adults (18–57 years, 47 % female) with DS. We evaluated feasibility (proportion of participants completing the task), distributional properties, construct validity, developmental sensitivity, and split-half reliability. Nineteen individuals were reassessed for test-retest reliability. Individuals with DS were compared to typically developing (TD) groups matched on chronological and mental age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DTT showed adequate feasibility (≥ 80 %) for individuals with DS and mild intellectual disability (ID), no relevant floor effects, acceptable construct validity, developmental sensitivity, good split-half reliability, and preliminary evidence for good test-retest reliability in DS. DTT performance differed between DS and TD individuals matched on chronological age, but not when matched on mental age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although limited in applicability for individuals with DS and moderate ID, the DTT shows potential as a direct measure of cognitive flexibility in DS across a broad age range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225000496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychometrically sound instruments to assess cognitive flexibility in people with Down Syndrome (DS) are lacking. The Trail Making Test (TMT) is well-established but requires reading letters and numerals, limiting its applicability for people with DS.

Aims

To evaluate the psychometric properties and developmental sensitivity of a newly developed TMT adaptation without letters and numerals – the Dice Trails Test (DTT).

Methods

The DTT was administered to 39 children (8–14 years, 46 % female) and 57 adults (18–57 years, 47 % female) with DS. We evaluated feasibility (proportion of participants completing the task), distributional properties, construct validity, developmental sensitivity, and split-half reliability. Nineteen individuals were reassessed for test-retest reliability. Individuals with DS were compared to typically developing (TD) groups matched on chronological and mental age.

Results

The DTT showed adequate feasibility (≥ 80 %) for individuals with DS and mild intellectual disability (ID), no relevant floor effects, acceptable construct validity, developmental sensitivity, good split-half reliability, and preliminary evidence for good test-retest reliability in DS. DTT performance differed between DS and TD individuals matched on chronological age, but not when matched on mental age.

Conclusions

Although limited in applicability for individuals with DS and moderate ID, the DTT shows potential as a direct measure of cognitive flexibility in DS across a broad age range.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信