Usefulness in rehabilitation of the paper Multiple Errands Test to assess executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar or autism disorders. Results from the REHABase cohort study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Denis Boucaud-Maitre, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Catherine Massoubre, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Frédéric Haesebaert, Nicolas Franck, Guillaume Barbalat
{"title":"Usefulness in rehabilitation of the paper Multiple Errands Test to assess executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar or autism disorders. Results from the REHABase cohort study.","authors":"Denis Boucaud-Maitre, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Catherine Massoubre, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Frédéric Haesebaert, Nicolas Franck, Guillaume Barbalat","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuropsychological tests measuring executive functions are useful for identifying specific cognitive disorders, but they have limits for characterizing executive dysfunction in everyday activities. This study aims to investigate the socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial features associated with executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism spectrum disorders using a Paper Multiple Errands Test.</p><p><strong>Patients or materials and methods: </strong>A total of 1071 adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 329 with bipolar spectrum disorder, and 254 with autism spectrum disorder were recruited from the French National Centers of Reference for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (REHABase) cohort between January 2016 and October 2022. Executive function severity was assessed by the multiple errands test. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted as well as results from standardized scales for self-stigma, quality of life, well-being, and self-esteem. Data were analyzed using bivariate and Quasi-Poisson regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of errors measured by the paper multiple errands test was 3.1±1.9 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n=1071), 2.4±1.8 in bipolar disorder (n=329), and 2.6±1.9 in autism disorder (n=254). Factors significantly associated with the number of errors were (1) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, working memory, and insight in patients with schizophrenia; (2) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, and working memory in patients with bipolar disorder; and (3) education level and working memory in patients with autism disorder. The number of errors was associated with lower quality of life, well-being and self-esteem, but not self-stigma, in all three disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The predictors of executive dysfunction observed with the paper multiple errands test were similar to those found with other tests of executive function. The paper multiple errands test is associated with essential psychosocial determinants in rehabilitation, particularly quality of life and well-being, and provides a wide range of information about functioning in community living.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2025.01.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neuropsychological tests measuring executive functions are useful for identifying specific cognitive disorders, but they have limits for characterizing executive dysfunction in everyday activities. This study aims to investigate the socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial features associated with executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism spectrum disorders using a Paper Multiple Errands Test.

Patients or materials and methods: A total of 1071 adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 329 with bipolar spectrum disorder, and 254 with autism spectrum disorder were recruited from the French National Centers of Reference for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (REHABase) cohort between January 2016 and October 2022. Executive function severity was assessed by the multiple errands test. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted as well as results from standardized scales for self-stigma, quality of life, well-being, and self-esteem. Data were analyzed using bivariate and Quasi-Poisson regression model.

Results: The mean number of errors measured by the paper multiple errands test was 3.1±1.9 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n=1071), 2.4±1.8 in bipolar disorder (n=329), and 2.6±1.9 in autism disorder (n=254). Factors significantly associated with the number of errors were (1) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, working memory, and insight in patients with schizophrenia; (2) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, and working memory in patients with bipolar disorder; and (3) education level and working memory in patients with autism disorder. The number of errors was associated with lower quality of life, well-being and self-esteem, but not self-stigma, in all three disorders.

Conclusion: The predictors of executive dysfunction observed with the paper multiple errands test were similar to those found with other tests of executive function. The paper multiple errands test is associated with essential psychosocial determinants in rehabilitation, particularly quality of life and well-being, and provides a wide range of information about functioning in community living.

在精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或自闭症患者的康复治疗中使用纸质多重任务测试评估执行功能的实用性。REHABase队列研究的结果。
目的:测量执行功能的神经心理学测试对识别特定的认知障碍是有用的,但它们在描述日常活动中的执行功能障碍方面有局限性。本研究旨在调查精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和自闭症谱系障碍患者的执行功能相关的社会人口学、临床和社会心理特征。患者或材料和方法:2016年1月至2022年10月,从法国国家精神康复参考中心(REHABase)队列中招募了1071名患有精神分裂症谱系障碍的成年人,329名患有双相情感障碍的成年人和254名患有自闭症谱系障碍的成年人。执行功能严重程度通过多重差事测试评估。提取社会人口学和临床数据,以及自我耻辱、生活质量、幸福感和自尊的标准化量表的结果。数据分析采用双变量和准泊松回归模型。结果:在精神分裂症谱系障碍(n=1071)、双相情感障碍(n=329)和自闭症障碍(n=254)中,纸上多重差事测验的平均误差数分别为3.1±1.9、2.4±1.8和2.6±1.9。与错误次数显著相关的因素有:(1)精神分裂症患者的年龄、病程、住院次数、教育程度、工作记忆和洞察力;(2)双相情感障碍患者的年龄、病程、住院次数、文化程度和工作记忆;(3)自闭症患者受教育程度与工作记忆的关系。在所有三种疾病中,错误的数量与较低的生活质量、幸福感和自尊有关,但与自我耻辱无关。结论:纸上多任务测试与其他执行功能测试的预测结果相似。多重任务测试与康复中的基本心理社会决定因素有关,特别是生活质量和福祉,并提供有关社区生活功能的广泛信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信