A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional questionnaire studies of the relationship between negative and positive emotional eating and body mass index: Valence matters

IF 4.6 2区医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Appetite Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.107966

Laurence J. Nolan , Wesley R. Barnhart , Gabriela Diorio , Veronica Gallo , Allan Geliebter

{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional questionnaire studies of the relationship between negative and positive emotional eating and body mass index: Valence matters","authors":"Laurence J. Nolan , Wesley R. Barnhart , Gabriela Diorio , Veronica Gallo , Allan Geliebter","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Questionnaire measures of negative emotional eating (NEE) have been associated with elevated body mass index (BMI). Relatively fewer studies have examined positive emotional eating (PEE) and they report that PEE is associated with lower BMI or is not associated with BMI. To examine whether NEE and PEE are linked to BMI, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that used the Emotional Appetite Questionnaire (EMAQ) and the Salzburg Emotional Eating Scale (SEES), which assess change in eating associated with positive and negative emotions, and measured BMI in adults with a range of BMIs. A search of databases (CINAHL Medline, and PsycINFO), citations (Google Scholar) and dissertations (Proquest), and a preprint registry (Open Science Framework, OSF) was conducted independently by three screeners. Forty-three cross-sectional studies were eligible for inclusion. Correlations between BMI and NEE scales and PEE scales were extracted. Age and sex were examined as potential moderators. We found statistically significant (ps < .001) and small mean effect sizes with random-effects models. Higher EMAQ NEE (d = .152 [.11, .19], N = 18,576) and SEES NEE scales (sadness, d = .209 [.168, .250]; angry, d = .096 [.047, .144]; anxiety, d = .169 [.124, .211], N = 4141) were associated with higher BMI. The EMAQ PEE (d = −.073 [-.106, −.041], N = 18,806) and the SEES happy (d = −.157 [-.100, −.114], N = 4141) scales were associated with lower BMI. There was significant heterogeneity in effect sizes for PEE and NEE; however, there was no statistically significant moderation by age or sex. There was also no evidence for publication bias except for SEES sadness. This analysis is limited to cross-sectional questionnaire-based studies. NEE may be associated more strongly than PEE with emotional regulation difficulties and overeating of energy-dense foods which may be why it is associated with higher BMI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107966"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questionnaire measures of negative emotional eating (NEE) have been associated with elevated body mass index (BMI). Relatively fewer studies have examined positive emotional eating (PEE) and they report that PEE is associated with lower BMI or is not associated with BMI. To examine whether NEE and PEE are linked to BMI, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that used the Emotional Appetite Questionnaire (EMAQ) and the Salzburg Emotional Eating Scale (SEES), which assess change in eating associated with positive and negative emotions, and measured BMI in adults with a range of BMIs. A search of databases (CINAHL Medline, and PsycINFO), citations (Google Scholar) and dissertations (Proquest), and a preprint registry (Open Science Framework, OSF) was conducted independently by three screeners. Forty-three cross-sectional studies were eligible for inclusion. Correlations between BMI and NEE scales and PEE scales were extracted. Age and sex were examined as potential moderators. We found statistically significant (ps < .001) and small mean effect sizes with random-effects models. Higher EMAQ NEE (d = .152 [.11, .19], N = 18,576) and SEES NEE scales (sadness, d = .209 [.168, .250]; angry, d = .096 [.047, .144]; anxiety, d = .169 [.124, .211], N = 4141) were associated with higher BMI. The EMAQ PEE (d = −.073 [-.106, −.041], N = 18,806) and the SEES happy (d = −.157 [-.100, −.114], N = 4141) scales were associated with lower BMI. There was significant heterogeneity in effect sizes for PEE and NEE; however, there was no statistically significant moderation by age or sex. There was also no evidence for publication bias except for SEES sadness. This analysis is limited to cross-sectional questionnaire-based studies. NEE may be associated more strongly than PEE with emotional regulation difficulties and overeating of energy-dense foods which may be why it is associated with higher BMI.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Appetite 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

9.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

566

审稿时长

13.4 weeks

期刊介绍： Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.