Classification using hyperdimensional computing: a review with comparative analysis

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Pere Vergés, Mike Heddes, Igor Nunes, Denis Kleyko, Tony Givargis, Alexandru Nicolau
{"title":"Classification using hyperdimensional computing: a review with comparative analysis","authors":"Pere Vergés,&nbsp;Mike Heddes,&nbsp;Igor Nunes,&nbsp;Denis Kleyko,&nbsp;Tony Givargis,&nbsp;Alexandru Nicolau","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11181-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hyperdimensional computing (HD), also known as vector symbolic architectures (VSA), is an emerging and promising paradigm for cognitive computing. At its core, HD/VSA is characterized by its distinctive approach to compositionally representing information using high-dimensional randomized vectors. The recent surge in research within this field gains momentum from its computational efficiency stemming from low-resolution representations and ability to excel in few-shot learning scenarios. Nonetheless, the current literature is missing a comprehensive comparative analysis of various methods since each of them uses a different benchmark to evaluate its performance. This gap obstructs the monitoring of the field’s state-of-the-art advancements and acts as a significant barrier to its overall progress. To address this gap, this review not only offers a conceptual overview of the latest literature but also introduces a comprehensive comparative study of HD/VSA classification methods. The exploration starts with an overview of the strategies proposed to encode information as high-dimensional vectors. These vectors serve as integral components in the construction of classification models. Furthermore, we evaluate diverse classification methods as proposed in the existing literature. This evaluation encompasses techniques such as retraining and regenerative training to augment the model’s performance. To conclude our study, we present a comprehensive empirical study. This study serves as an in-depth analysis, systematically comparing various HD/VSA classification methods using two benchmarks, the first being a set of seven popular datasets used in HD/VSA and the second consisting of 121 datasets being the subset from the UCI Machine Learning repository. To facilitate future research on classification with HD/VSA, we open-sourced the benchmarking and the implementations of the methods we review. Since the considered data are tabular, encodings based on key-value pairs emerge as optimal choices, boasting superior accuracy while maintaining high efficiency. Secondly, iterative adaptive methods demonstrate remarkable efficacy, potentially complemented by a regenerative strategy, depending on the specific problem. Furthermore, we show how HD/VSA is able to generalize while training with a limited number of training instances. Lastly, we demonstrate the robustness of HD/VSA methods by subjecting the model memory to a large number of bit-flips. The results illustrate that the model’s performance remains reasonably stable until the occurrence of 40% of bit flips, where the model’s performance is drastically degraded. Overall, this study performed a thorough performance evaluation on different methods and, on the one hand, a positive trend was observed in terms of improving classification performance but, on the other hand, these developments could often be surpassed by off-the-shelf methods. This calls for better integration with the broader machine learning literature; the developed benchmarking framework provides practical means for doing so.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11181-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11181-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hyperdimensional computing (HD), also known as vector symbolic architectures (VSA), is an emerging and promising paradigm for cognitive computing. At its core, HD/VSA is characterized by its distinctive approach to compositionally representing information using high-dimensional randomized vectors. The recent surge in research within this field gains momentum from its computational efficiency stemming from low-resolution representations and ability to excel in few-shot learning scenarios. Nonetheless, the current literature is missing a comprehensive comparative analysis of various methods since each of them uses a different benchmark to evaluate its performance. This gap obstructs the monitoring of the field’s state-of-the-art advancements and acts as a significant barrier to its overall progress. To address this gap, this review not only offers a conceptual overview of the latest literature but also introduces a comprehensive comparative study of HD/VSA classification methods. The exploration starts with an overview of the strategies proposed to encode information as high-dimensional vectors. These vectors serve as integral components in the construction of classification models. Furthermore, we evaluate diverse classification methods as proposed in the existing literature. This evaluation encompasses techniques such as retraining and regenerative training to augment the model’s performance. To conclude our study, we present a comprehensive empirical study. This study serves as an in-depth analysis, systematically comparing various HD/VSA classification methods using two benchmarks, the first being a set of seven popular datasets used in HD/VSA and the second consisting of 121 datasets being the subset from the UCI Machine Learning repository. To facilitate future research on classification with HD/VSA, we open-sourced the benchmarking and the implementations of the methods we review. Since the considered data are tabular, encodings based on key-value pairs emerge as optimal choices, boasting superior accuracy while maintaining high efficiency. Secondly, iterative adaptive methods demonstrate remarkable efficacy, potentially complemented by a regenerative strategy, depending on the specific problem. Furthermore, we show how HD/VSA is able to generalize while training with a limited number of training instances. Lastly, we demonstrate the robustness of HD/VSA methods by subjecting the model memory to a large number of bit-flips. The results illustrate that the model’s performance remains reasonably stable until the occurrence of 40% of bit flips, where the model’s performance is drastically degraded. Overall, this study performed a thorough performance evaluation on different methods and, on the one hand, a positive trend was observed in terms of improving classification performance but, on the other hand, these developments could often be surpassed by off-the-shelf methods. This calls for better integration with the broader machine learning literature; the developed benchmarking framework provides practical means for doing so.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信