Polyp segmentation in medical imaging: challenges, approaches and future directions

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Abdul Qayoom, Juanying Xie, Haider Ali
{"title":"Polyp segmentation in medical imaging: challenges, approaches and future directions","authors":"Abdul Qayoom,&nbsp;Juanying Xie,&nbsp;Haider Ali","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11173-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Colorectal cancer has been considered as the third most dangerous disease among the most common cancer types. The early diagnosis of the polyps weakens the spread of colorectal cancer and is significant for more productive treatment. The segmentation of polyps from the colonoscopy images is very critical and significant to identify colorectal cancer. In this comprehensive study, we meticulously scrutinize research papers focused on the automated segmentation of polyps in clinical settings using colonoscopy images proposed in the past five years. Our analysis delves into various dimensions, including input data (datasets and preprocessing methods), model design (encompassing CNNs, transformers, and hybrid approaches), loss functions, and evaluation metrics. By adopting a systematic perspective, we examine how different methodological choices have shaped current trends and identify critical limitations that need to be addressed. To facilitate meaningful comparisons, we provide a detailed summary table of all examined works. Moreover, we offer in-depth future recommendations for polyp segmentation based on the insights gained from this survey study. We believe that our study will serve as a great resource for future researchers in the subject of polyp segmentation offering vital support in the development of novel methodologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11173-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11173-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer has been considered as the third most dangerous disease among the most common cancer types. The early diagnosis of the polyps weakens the spread of colorectal cancer and is significant for more productive treatment. The segmentation of polyps from the colonoscopy images is very critical and significant to identify colorectal cancer. In this comprehensive study, we meticulously scrutinize research papers focused on the automated segmentation of polyps in clinical settings using colonoscopy images proposed in the past five years. Our analysis delves into various dimensions, including input data (datasets and preprocessing methods), model design (encompassing CNNs, transformers, and hybrid approaches), loss functions, and evaluation metrics. By adopting a systematic perspective, we examine how different methodological choices have shaped current trends and identify critical limitations that need to be addressed. To facilitate meaningful comparisons, we provide a detailed summary table of all examined works. Moreover, we offer in-depth future recommendations for polyp segmentation based on the insights gained from this survey study. We believe that our study will serve as a great resource for future researchers in the subject of polyp segmentation offering vital support in the development of novel methodologies.

医学影像中的息肉分割:挑战、方法和未来方向
在最常见的癌症类型中,结直肠癌被认为是第三大最危险的疾病。息肉的早期诊断削弱了结直肠癌的扩散,对更有效的治疗具有重要意义。结肠镜图像中息肉的分割对结直肠癌的鉴别是非常关键和重要的。在这项综合研究中,我们仔细审查了过去五年来关于使用结肠镜图像在临床环境中自动分割息肉的研究论文。我们的分析深入到各个维度,包括输入数据(数据集和预处理方法)、模型设计(包括cnn、变压器和混合方法)、损失函数和评估指标。通过采用系统的视角,我们研究了不同的方法选择如何塑造了当前的趋势,并确定了需要解决的关键限制。为了便于进行有意义的比较,我们提供了所有被检查作品的详细汇总表。此外,我们根据调查研究获得的见解,对息肉分割的未来提出了深入的建议。我们相信我们的研究将为未来的息肉分割研究人员提供重要的资源,为新方法的发展提供重要的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信