Methamphetamine Use Practices, Motivations, and Perceived Benefits and Risks: Exploring Differences Between Males and Females.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Madeline Hooten, Sydney Silverstein, Raminta Daniulaityte
{"title":"Methamphetamine Use Practices, Motivations, and Perceived Benefits and Risks: Exploring Differences Between Males and Females.","authors":"Madeline Hooten, Sydney Silverstein, Raminta Daniulaityte","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2478090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methamphetamine use has increased across the US. To develop adequate interventions, understanding differences in male and female methamphetamine use is critical. Conducted in Dayton, Ohio, this study explores sex differences in attitudes and practices of methamphetamine use. Between 12/2019 and 11/2021, the study recruited 91 participants. Bivariate analyses were used to identify sex differences. Of the 91 participants, 52.7% were female, 95.6% were non-Hispanic white, and the mean age was 42.4 (SD 10.6) years. Age of methamphetamine initiation was similar for males and females (31.7 vs. 29.3). Participants reported multiple reasons for methamphetamine use, but females were more likely to report use to quit opioids (60.4% vs. 39.5%, <i>p</i> = .047), lose weight (35.4% vs. 14.0%, <i>p</i> = .019), and self-treat ADHD symptoms (43.8% vs. 16.3%, <i>p</i> = .005). Females were more likely to endorse increased productivity (81.3% vs. 48.8%, <i>p</i> = .001) as a benefit of methamphetamine use. Females were also more likely to endorse the following perceived risks of methamphetamine: depression (91.7% vs. 74.4%, <i>p</i> = .027), skin problems (100.0% vs. 76.2%, <i>p</i> = <0.001), aggression/violence (93.8% vs. 65.1%, <i>p</i> = <0.001), risk of HIV/AIDS (85.4% vs. 60.5%, <i>p</i> = .007), teeth problems (100.0% vs. 90.7%, <i>p</i> = .032), exposure to fentanyl contamination (81.3% vs. 55.8%, <i>p</i> = .009), and increased risk of an overdose (39.6% vs. 16.3%, <i>p</i> = .014).</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2478090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methamphetamine use has increased across the US. To develop adequate interventions, understanding differences in male and female methamphetamine use is critical. Conducted in Dayton, Ohio, this study explores sex differences in attitudes and practices of methamphetamine use. Between 12/2019 and 11/2021, the study recruited 91 participants. Bivariate analyses were used to identify sex differences. Of the 91 participants, 52.7% were female, 95.6% were non-Hispanic white, and the mean age was 42.4 (SD 10.6) years. Age of methamphetamine initiation was similar for males and females (31.7 vs. 29.3). Participants reported multiple reasons for methamphetamine use, but females were more likely to report use to quit opioids (60.4% vs. 39.5%, p = .047), lose weight (35.4% vs. 14.0%, p = .019), and self-treat ADHD symptoms (43.8% vs. 16.3%, p = .005). Females were more likely to endorse increased productivity (81.3% vs. 48.8%, p = .001) as a benefit of methamphetamine use. Females were also more likely to endorse the following perceived risks of methamphetamine: depression (91.7% vs. 74.4%, p = .027), skin problems (100.0% vs. 76.2%, p = <0.001), aggression/violence (93.8% vs. 65.1%, p = <0.001), risk of HIV/AIDS (85.4% vs. 60.5%, p = .007), teeth problems (100.0% vs. 90.7%, p = .032), exposure to fentanyl contamination (81.3% vs. 55.8%, p = .009), and increased risk of an overdose (39.6% vs. 16.3%, p = .014).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信