Efficient estimation of natural gas leakage source terms using physical information and improved particle filtering

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Qi Jing , Xingwang Song , Bingcai Sun , Yuntao Li , Laibin Zhang
{"title":"Efficient estimation of natural gas leakage source terms using physical information and improved particle filtering","authors":"Qi Jing ,&nbsp;Xingwang Song ,&nbsp;Bingcai Sun ,&nbsp;Yuntao Li ,&nbsp;Laibin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.110989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural gas pipeline leaks can cause fires or explosions, making quick and accurate leak source identification critical for emergency response. This study develops a natural gas pipeline leakage source inversion model, where a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Physics-Informed Neural Network (POD-PINN) is integrated as the gas forward diffusion model. The inversion model combines an improved particle filtering algorithm, gas sensor data, and the POD-PINN, enabling rapid identification of leakage source terms. The gas source estimation results using POD-PINN and the Gaussian model as forward models were compared across different scenarios, and the impact of sensor errors on the inversion model was analyzed. Using POD-PINN as the forward model preserves accuracy while improving computational efficiency. The inclusion of a Gaussian kernel function and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method addresses degeneracy and impoverishment issues in standard particle filtering, preventing convergence to local optima. Results show that, across different scenarios, spatial position estimation errors are under 5%, and source strength errors are below 8%. When sensor measurement error is exceeds 0.5, the model cannot accurately estimate all source parameters. The proposed inversion model is subjected to convergence analysis, confirming its feasibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 110989"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025001929","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural gas pipeline leaks can cause fires or explosions, making quick and accurate leak source identification critical for emergency response. This study develops a natural gas pipeline leakage source inversion model, where a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Physics-Informed Neural Network (POD-PINN) is integrated as the gas forward diffusion model. The inversion model combines an improved particle filtering algorithm, gas sensor data, and the POD-PINN, enabling rapid identification of leakage source terms. The gas source estimation results using POD-PINN and the Gaussian model as forward models were compared across different scenarios, and the impact of sensor errors on the inversion model was analyzed. Using POD-PINN as the forward model preserves accuracy while improving computational efficiency. The inclusion of a Gaussian kernel function and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method addresses degeneracy and impoverishment issues in standard particle filtering, preventing convergence to local optima. Results show that, across different scenarios, spatial position estimation errors are under 5%, and source strength errors are below 8%. When sensor measurement error is exceeds 0.5, the model cannot accurately estimate all source parameters. The proposed inversion model is subjected to convergence analysis, confirming its feasibility.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信