Ido Rog, Marcel G A van der Heijden, S Franz Bender, Raphael Boussageon, Antonin Lambach, Klaus Schlaeppi, Natacha Bodenhausen, Stefanie Lutz
{"title":"Mycorrhizal inoculation success depends on soil health and crop productivity.","authors":"Ido Rog, Marcel G A van der Heijden, S Franz Bender, Raphael Boussageon, Antonin Lambach, Klaus Schlaeppi, Natacha Bodenhausen, Stefanie Lutz","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the human population grows, so does the demand for higher agricultural yields. As a result, agricultural intensification practices are increasing while soil health is often declining. Integrating the benefits of microorganisms into agricultural management systems can reduce the need for external resource inputs. One particular group of plant symbionts that can help plants to acquire additional nutrients and promote plant growth are arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The application of AMF in agricultural practice has been hampered by the variability in the success of mycorrhizal inoculation and the lack of consistency in different fields. Here, we tested whether it is possible to predict mycorrhizal inoculation success based on soil health and productivity. We hypothesised higher inoculation success on fields with poor soil health because in such fields, mycorrhiza can improve nutrient uptake and biotic resistance to pathogens. We calculated a soil health index by aggregating six biotic and abiotic variables from 54 maize fields and tested its correlation with the mycorrhizal growth response (MGR). The MGR was linked to soil health and significantly higher in less healthy soils and less productive fields. This implies that soil inoculation with AMF has most potential in fields with poor soil health and low productivity. Based on these findings, we propose a soil health framework that highlights the potential benefits of AMF field inoculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaf031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the human population grows, so does the demand for higher agricultural yields. As a result, agricultural intensification practices are increasing while soil health is often declining. Integrating the benefits of microorganisms into agricultural management systems can reduce the need for external resource inputs. One particular group of plant symbionts that can help plants to acquire additional nutrients and promote plant growth are arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The application of AMF in agricultural practice has been hampered by the variability in the success of mycorrhizal inoculation and the lack of consistency in different fields. Here, we tested whether it is possible to predict mycorrhizal inoculation success based on soil health and productivity. We hypothesised higher inoculation success on fields with poor soil health because in such fields, mycorrhiza can improve nutrient uptake and biotic resistance to pathogens. We calculated a soil health index by aggregating six biotic and abiotic variables from 54 maize fields and tested its correlation with the mycorrhizal growth response (MGR). The MGR was linked to soil health and significantly higher in less healthy soils and less productive fields. This implies that soil inoculation with AMF has most potential in fields with poor soil health and low productivity. Based on these findings, we propose a soil health framework that highlights the potential benefits of AMF field inoculation.
期刊介绍:
FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered.
2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020)
Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology)
The journal is divided into eight Sections:
Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies)
Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens)
Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology
Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses)
Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies)
Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea)
Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature)
Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology)
If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.