Drivers of and barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan implementation: Lessons from Copenhagen

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Noah V. Peters , Lucia A. Reisch , on behalf of the PEN-Consortium
{"title":"Drivers of and barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan implementation: Lessons from Copenhagen","authors":"Noah V. Peters ,&nbsp;Lucia A. Reisch ,&nbsp;on behalf of the PEN-Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2013, the European Commission introduced Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to promote healthy and sustainable cities. Because policymakers and researchers seek to understand the drivers of and barriers to SUMP implementation, we assessed the mobility plan of a frontrunner in sustainability: Copenhagen, Denmark. Informed by a review of policy documents, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts on Copenhagen’s SUMP and analysed the data using thematic analysis. We find that Copenhagen’s SUMP implementation follows city-specific rather than European guidelines and is embedded in opposing institutional and political frameworks. The city’s established commitment to sustainability and urban liveability provides fertile ground for SUMP implementation, but motorised traffic remains dominant. In terms of evaluation, the SUMP defines and follows up on various implementation goals. Nonetheless, evaluation methods, policy lessons and status-group representation remain somewhat selective. Overall, the Copenhagen case shows that cities’ unique characteristics influence how policymakers embrace generic planning frameworks like SUMPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2013, the European Commission introduced Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to promote healthy and sustainable cities. Because policymakers and researchers seek to understand the drivers of and barriers to SUMP implementation, we assessed the mobility plan of a frontrunner in sustainability: Copenhagen, Denmark. Informed by a review of policy documents, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts on Copenhagen’s SUMP and analysed the data using thematic analysis. We find that Copenhagen’s SUMP implementation follows city-specific rather than European guidelines and is embedded in opposing institutional and political frameworks. The city’s established commitment to sustainability and urban liveability provides fertile ground for SUMP implementation, but motorised traffic remains dominant. In terms of evaluation, the SUMP defines and follows up on various implementation goals. Nonetheless, evaluation methods, policy lessons and status-group representation remain somewhat selective. Overall, the Copenhagen case shows that cities’ unique characteristics influence how policymakers embrace generic planning frameworks like SUMPs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信