A comprehensive review and future research directions of ensemble learning models for predicting building energy consumption

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Zeyu Wang , Yuelan Hong , Luying Huang , Miaocui Zheng , Hongping Yuan , Ruochen Zeng
{"title":"A comprehensive review and future research directions of ensemble learning models for predicting building energy consumption","authors":"Zeyu Wang ,&nbsp;Yuelan Hong ,&nbsp;Luying Huang ,&nbsp;Miaocui Zheng ,&nbsp;Hongping Yuan ,&nbsp;Ruochen Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensemble learning has garnered increasing attention in building energy prediction over the past decade due to its exceptional predictive accuracy. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews that comprehensively analyze its current research status, limitations, and challenges, particularly in the context of large-scale practical applications. To address this gap, this review article systematically evaluates the application of ensemble learning models in building energy prediction. Using the PRISMA method, 82 relevant articles published between 2013 and 2024 in the Web of Science database were analyzed. The findings indicate that heterogeneous ensemble models, which integrate diverse algorithms, and homogeneous ensemble models, which utilize multiple data subsets, both hold significant potential for enhancing prediction accuracy. Specifically, heterogeneous models achieved accuracy improvements ranging from 2.59% to 80.10%, while homogeneous models demonstrated more stable improvements of 3.83% to 33.89%. Nonetheless, the integration of multiple base models increases computational complexity, resulting in higher computation times. Despite this drawback, the improved prediction accuracy, robustness, and generalization capabilities of ensemble models justify the additional computational cost. The review identifies key limitations, including the subjective selection of learning algorithms, the lack of systematic methods for evaluating model diversity, and insufficient exploration of combination strategies. Future research should focus on developing objective criteria for algorithm selection, advancing diversity evaluation techniques, analyzing the effects of combination methods, comparing computational efficiency, and validating the robustness and generalizability of ensemble models. This study offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to optimize ensemble learning models in building energy prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 115589"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825003196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensemble learning has garnered increasing attention in building energy prediction over the past decade due to its exceptional predictive accuracy. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews that comprehensively analyze its current research status, limitations, and challenges, particularly in the context of large-scale practical applications. To address this gap, this review article systematically evaluates the application of ensemble learning models in building energy prediction. Using the PRISMA method, 82 relevant articles published between 2013 and 2024 in the Web of Science database were analyzed. The findings indicate that heterogeneous ensemble models, which integrate diverse algorithms, and homogeneous ensemble models, which utilize multiple data subsets, both hold significant potential for enhancing prediction accuracy. Specifically, heterogeneous models achieved accuracy improvements ranging from 2.59% to 80.10%, while homogeneous models demonstrated more stable improvements of 3.83% to 33.89%. Nonetheless, the integration of multiple base models increases computational complexity, resulting in higher computation times. Despite this drawback, the improved prediction accuracy, robustness, and generalization capabilities of ensemble models justify the additional computational cost. The review identifies key limitations, including the subjective selection of learning algorithms, the lack of systematic methods for evaluating model diversity, and insufficient exploration of combination strategies. Future research should focus on developing objective criteria for algorithm selection, advancing diversity evaluation techniques, analyzing the effects of combination methods, comparing computational efficiency, and validating the robustness and generalizability of ensemble models. This study offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to optimize ensemble learning models in building energy prediction.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信