Gender differences in like-sex middle-aged twins: an extended network analysis of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions and leisure activities.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Daiyan Zhang, Maria Semkovska
{"title":"Gender differences in like-sex middle-aged twins: an extended network analysis of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions and leisure activities.","authors":"Daiyan Zhang, Maria Semkovska","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression affects twice as many women as men. Risk factors for depression certainly impact this difference, but their strong interconnectedness challenges the assessment of standalone contributions. Network models allow the identification of systematic independent relationships between individual symptoms and risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the extended networks of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions, and leisure activities in like-sex twins differ depending on gender or zygosity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twins, including 2,040 women (918 monozygotic and 1,122 dizygotic) and 1,712 men (730 monozygotic and 982 dizygotic), were selected from the Danish Twin Registry for having, along with their like-sex co-twin, completed measures of depressive symptoms, cognition, and leisure activities (physical, intellectual, and social). Network models were estimated and compared at three levels: co-twins to each other within groups defined by gender and zygosity; monozygotic to dizygotic twins within the same gender, and between genders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed when co-twins were compared to each other, regardless of the pair's zygosity or gender, nor when monozygotic twins were compared to dizygotic twins within gender. However, the gendered networks differed significantly in global strength, structure, and partial correlations between specific depressive symptoms and risk factors, all indicating stronger connectedness in women relative to men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Environmental factors appear to best explain between-gender network differences. Women's networks showed significantly stronger associations both among depressive symptoms and between depressive symptoms and risk factors (i.e., decreased cognition and leisure activities). Longitudinal research is needed to determine the causality and directionality of these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e46"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.31","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression affects twice as many women as men. Risk factors for depression certainly impact this difference, but their strong interconnectedness challenges the assessment of standalone contributions. Network models allow the identification of systematic independent relationships between individual symptoms and risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the extended networks of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions, and leisure activities in like-sex twins differ depending on gender or zygosity.

Methods: Twins, including 2,040 women (918 monozygotic and 1,122 dizygotic) and 1,712 men (730 monozygotic and 982 dizygotic), were selected from the Danish Twin Registry for having, along with their like-sex co-twin, completed measures of depressive symptoms, cognition, and leisure activities (physical, intellectual, and social). Network models were estimated and compared at three levels: co-twins to each other within groups defined by gender and zygosity; monozygotic to dizygotic twins within the same gender, and between genders.

Results: No significant differences were observed when co-twins were compared to each other, regardless of the pair's zygosity or gender, nor when monozygotic twins were compared to dizygotic twins within gender. However, the gendered networks differed significantly in global strength, structure, and partial correlations between specific depressive symptoms and risk factors, all indicating stronger connectedness in women relative to men.

Conclusions: Environmental factors appear to best explain between-gender network differences. Women's networks showed significantly stronger associations both among depressive symptoms and between depressive symptoms and risk factors (i.e., decreased cognition and leisure activities). Longitudinal research is needed to determine the causality and directionality of these relationships.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信