Evaluating the repeatability of the multifocal electroretinogram in the cone dominant 13-lined ground squirrel.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nicole Manfredonia, Hannah M Follett, Phyllis Summerfelt, James A Kuchenbecker, Joseph Carroll, Ching Tzu Yu
{"title":"Evaluating the repeatability of the multifocal electroretinogram in the cone dominant 13-lined ground squirrel.","authors":"Nicole Manfredonia, Hannah M Follett, Phyllis Summerfelt, James A Kuchenbecker, Joseph Carroll, Ching Tzu Yu","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10010-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the repeatability of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in the 13-lined ground squirrel (13-LGS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>13-LGS (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus, 2 M/4F, n = 12 eyes) were equally divided between 61-segment or 103-segment protocols containing two consecutive mfERG scans per session, and two total sessions performed one week apart per eye. The trough-to-peak amplitudes were analyzed under three conditions: raw, normalized to the optic nerve head (ONH), and normalized to the visual streak (VS). For intrasession repeatability, the two consecutive scans within each session were analyzed. For intersession repeatability analyses, one scan was randomly chosen from each day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intrasession repeatability of the mfERG trough-to-peak amplitude data averaged at 63% (Raw), 55% (ONH), and 50% (VS). There was no significant difference in repeatability between each day's intrasession repeatability values for all normalization conditions (Raw: Wilcoxon t-test, p = 0.2334; ONH: Paired t-test, p = 0.7803; VS: Wilcoxon t-test, p = 0.3804). Intersession percent repeatability of mfERG trough-to-peak amplitude data averaged at 72% (Raw), 61% (ONH), and 53% (VS). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (Friedman test, p = 0.0038). This was evident in the Benjamini-Hochberg method of controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) where there was a significant difference comparing Raw versus VS (p = 0.0130) and ONH versus VS (p = 0.0011). There was no difference comparing Raw versus ONH (p = 0.1076).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall intrasession and intersession repeatability of mfERG amplitude was relatively poor in our sample, though not markedly different than that reported in some other species and normalization methods did result in improved repeatability. As animal models are critical for vision research, these repeatability estimates will prove useful in interpreting future data collected following interventions or in longitudinal monitoring of disease models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10010-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the repeatability of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in the 13-lined ground squirrel (13-LGS).

Methods: 13-LGS (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus, 2 M/4F, n = 12 eyes) were equally divided between 61-segment or 103-segment protocols containing two consecutive mfERG scans per session, and two total sessions performed one week apart per eye. The trough-to-peak amplitudes were analyzed under three conditions: raw, normalized to the optic nerve head (ONH), and normalized to the visual streak (VS). For intrasession repeatability, the two consecutive scans within each session were analyzed. For intersession repeatability analyses, one scan was randomly chosen from each day.

Results: Intrasession repeatability of the mfERG trough-to-peak amplitude data averaged at 63% (Raw), 55% (ONH), and 50% (VS). There was no significant difference in repeatability between each day's intrasession repeatability values for all normalization conditions (Raw: Wilcoxon t-test, p = 0.2334; ONH: Paired t-test, p = 0.7803; VS: Wilcoxon t-test, p = 0.3804). Intersession percent repeatability of mfERG trough-to-peak amplitude data averaged at 72% (Raw), 61% (ONH), and 53% (VS). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (Friedman test, p = 0.0038). This was evident in the Benjamini-Hochberg method of controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) where there was a significant difference comparing Raw versus VS (p = 0.0130) and ONH versus VS (p = 0.0011). There was no difference comparing Raw versus ONH (p = 0.1076).

Conclusions: Overall intrasession and intersession repeatability of mfERG amplitude was relatively poor in our sample, though not markedly different than that reported in some other species and normalization methods did result in improved repeatability. As animal models are critical for vision research, these repeatability estimates will prove useful in interpreting future data collected following interventions or in longitudinal monitoring of disease models.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信