Suggestion of specific performance shaping factor update for the human reliability analysis framework of the TRIGA research reactor

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Wasin Vechgama , Jinkyun Park , Yochan Kim , Saensuk Wetchagarun , Anantachai Pechrak , Weerawat Pornroongruengchok , Kampanart Silva
{"title":"Suggestion of specific performance shaping factor update for the human reliability analysis framework of the TRIGA research reactor","authors":"Wasin Vechgama ,&nbsp;Jinkyun Park ,&nbsp;Yochan Kim ,&nbsp;Saensuk Wetchagarun ,&nbsp;Anantachai Pechrak ,&nbsp;Weerawat Pornroongruengchok ,&nbsp;Kampanart Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on the human reliability analysis (HRA) framework of the TRIGA research reactor, performance shaping factor (PSF) estimation is an important step when considering the effects of specific operating or working cultures in determining human error probabilities (HEPs). This study aims to suggest a method to develop specific PSFs for the HRA framework of the TRIGA research reactor through a TRR-1/M1 case study. The PSF survey of the HRA framework was developed based on the EMBRACE method to consider the negative impacts of each PSF compared to the normal situation of all four cognitive activities in the errors of omission and errors of commission modes. Given the varied experiences of experts, expert elicitation was employed to categorize high-performing, low-performing, and informative experts to ensure reliable data for PSF analysis. For low-performing and informative experts, the survey results of PSFs were improved by additional surveys to support an appropriate dataset for analyzing the PSFs of the HRA framework. The impact of PSFs within the HRA framework was estimated using the updated normal distribution of the posterior PSFs based on the classical model. The success likelihood index method successfully integrated all subjective expert judgments into a cohesive representation and offered a better systematic consensus model to generalize HEPs in the form of a normal distribution based on a large group of experts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 111010"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500211X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the human reliability analysis (HRA) framework of the TRIGA research reactor, performance shaping factor (PSF) estimation is an important step when considering the effects of specific operating or working cultures in determining human error probabilities (HEPs). This study aims to suggest a method to develop specific PSFs for the HRA framework of the TRIGA research reactor through a TRR-1/M1 case study. The PSF survey of the HRA framework was developed based on the EMBRACE method to consider the negative impacts of each PSF compared to the normal situation of all four cognitive activities in the errors of omission and errors of commission modes. Given the varied experiences of experts, expert elicitation was employed to categorize high-performing, low-performing, and informative experts to ensure reliable data for PSF analysis. For low-performing and informative experts, the survey results of PSFs were improved by additional surveys to support an appropriate dataset for analyzing the PSFs of the HRA framework. The impact of PSFs within the HRA framework was estimated using the updated normal distribution of the posterior PSFs based on the classical model. The success likelihood index method successfully integrated all subjective expert judgments into a cohesive representation and offered a better systematic consensus model to generalize HEPs in the form of a normal distribution based on a large group of experts.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信