A comparative analysis of climate friendly neighbourhoods in China and Norway: Insights on approaches, practices and policies from four case studies

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Johannes Brozovsky , John Clauß , Peng Liu , Tonje Trulsrud Healey-Brudal , Yunbo Yang , Ørjan Healey-Brudal , Jinping Li , Bojia Li
{"title":"A comparative analysis of climate friendly neighbourhoods in China and Norway: Insights on approaches, practices and policies from four case studies","authors":"Johannes Brozovsky ,&nbsp;John Clauß ,&nbsp;Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Tonje Trulsrud Healey-Brudal ,&nbsp;Yunbo Yang ,&nbsp;Ørjan Healey-Brudal ,&nbsp;Jinping Li ,&nbsp;Bojia Li","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate friendly neighbourhoods such as positive energy districts and zero emission and sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods aim to significantly reduce the environmental impact of urban areas by achieving higher levels of sustainability, energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy. Based on a questionnaire survey, this study analyses and compares four selected cases from China and Norway, providing a detailed description of commonalities and differences between them. Additionally, the study highlights current gaps in both countries’ regulations and proposes and discusses updates. The results show that the commonalities include the widespread use of photovoltaic systems and heat pumps, and the main difference is the use of building materials, with concrete in China and timber in Norway. From the selected cases it was found that both countries face challenges in integrating mobility considerations and citizen engagement in the planning of climate friendly neighbourhoods. Recommendations for future policy enhancements include the introduction of mandatory zero-carbon building codes, standards for circular economy practices, and financial incentives for deep retrofitting in order to speed up the decarbonisation of the building sector. The study also underscores the need for consistent definitions and regulations for climate friendly neighbourhoods and related concepts to streamline implementation and enhance credibility. Enhanced international cooperation and knowledge exchange are vital for global climate goals, with Norway and China offering valuable lessons in the pursuit of sustainable urban development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 115569"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825002993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate friendly neighbourhoods such as positive energy districts and zero emission and sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods aim to significantly reduce the environmental impact of urban areas by achieving higher levels of sustainability, energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy. Based on a questionnaire survey, this study analyses and compares four selected cases from China and Norway, providing a detailed description of commonalities and differences between them. Additionally, the study highlights current gaps in both countries’ regulations and proposes and discusses updates. The results show that the commonalities include the widespread use of photovoltaic systems and heat pumps, and the main difference is the use of building materials, with concrete in China and timber in Norway. From the selected cases it was found that both countries face challenges in integrating mobility considerations and citizen engagement in the planning of climate friendly neighbourhoods. Recommendations for future policy enhancements include the introduction of mandatory zero-carbon building codes, standards for circular economy practices, and financial incentives for deep retrofitting in order to speed up the decarbonisation of the building sector. The study also underscores the need for consistent definitions and regulations for climate friendly neighbourhoods and related concepts to streamline implementation and enhance credibility. Enhanced international cooperation and knowledge exchange are vital for global climate goals, with Norway and China offering valuable lessons in the pursuit of sustainable urban development.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信