Life cycle cost optimization for schools energy retrofit under climate change: Methodological approach and analyses in five different climates

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Ludovica Maria Campagna, Francesco Carlucci, Francesco Fiorito
{"title":"Life cycle cost optimization for schools energy retrofit under climate change: Methodological approach and analyses in five different climates","authors":"Ludovica Maria Campagna,&nbsp;Francesco Carlucci,&nbsp;Francesco Fiorito","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The energy renovation of existing schools has become a priority, to address which cost-effective retrofit strategies should be identified, considering the unavoidable climatic changes, to maximize the benefits during the whole service life. This paper presents a methodology useful for comparing different retrofit proposals by adopting a cost-optimal approach, in which the effects of future climate variations on energy needs were also considered. The methodology was applied to school buildings located in Italy, considering 5 different cities, with the aim of assessing whether an over-performing building − exceeding the minimum regulatory requirements − could provide economic benefits, considering future climatic evolutions and consequent energy needs variations. Different retrofit measures (active and passive) were identified, each of which was associated with different performance targets, starting with those required by the current national energy standard. Accordingly, 900 retrofit proposals were compared against a baseline retrofit option, that brings the building into compliance with current regulations. Optimal solutions were found through a single-objective optimization, performed combining Python and EnergyPlus, which aimed to minimise the global cost of the intervention over a 30-year time horizon. The evolution of climate conditions was also considered in this time interval, generating future weather files on the basis of the most recent SSP5-8.5 scenario. Results highlighted the importance of careful selection of retrofit measures, showing that exceeding regulatory standards does not automatically lead to economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 115561"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825002919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy renovation of existing schools has become a priority, to address which cost-effective retrofit strategies should be identified, considering the unavoidable climatic changes, to maximize the benefits during the whole service life. This paper presents a methodology useful for comparing different retrofit proposals by adopting a cost-optimal approach, in which the effects of future climate variations on energy needs were also considered. The methodology was applied to school buildings located in Italy, considering 5 different cities, with the aim of assessing whether an over-performing building − exceeding the minimum regulatory requirements − could provide economic benefits, considering future climatic evolutions and consequent energy needs variations. Different retrofit measures (active and passive) were identified, each of which was associated with different performance targets, starting with those required by the current national energy standard. Accordingly, 900 retrofit proposals were compared against a baseline retrofit option, that brings the building into compliance with current regulations. Optimal solutions were found through a single-objective optimization, performed combining Python and EnergyPlus, which aimed to minimise the global cost of the intervention over a 30-year time horizon. The evolution of climate conditions was also considered in this time interval, generating future weather files on the basis of the most recent SSP5-8.5 scenario. Results highlighted the importance of careful selection of retrofit measures, showing that exceeding regulatory standards does not automatically lead to economic benefits.
气候变化下学校能源改造的生命周期成本优化:五种不同气候条件下的方法和分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信