Cue Detection and Self-Debriefing Techniques in Virtual Simulation: Techniques Using Cognitive Engineering Inspired Expertise Development Approaches.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yan Xiao, Regina W Urban, Jennifer L Roye, Mary Beth Reid, John Schmitt, Joseph Borders, Gary Klein, Mary E Mancini
{"title":"Cue Detection and Self-Debriefing Techniques in Virtual Simulation: Techniques Using Cognitive Engineering Inspired Expertise Development Approaches.","authors":"Yan Xiao, Regina W Urban, Jennifer L Roye, Mary Beth Reid, John Schmitt, Joseph Borders, Gary Klein, Mary E Mancini","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Online experiential learning can benefit learners with scalable techniques to self-debrief and to develop cognitive skills in recognizing clinical cues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed techniques for cue-detection exercises and self-debriefing, based on cognitive engineering-inspired expertise development approaches that focus on tacit knowledge, sensemaking, and mental models. Self-debriefing was structured by asking the learners to compare and then reflect on their choices and rationales against those provided by a panel of experts. Using these techniques, we generated scenario-based experiential learning materials in a virtual environment for a 2-hour module on deteriorating patient conditions that can lead to imminent cardiac arrests. The module was tested in a senior nursing course as an optional assignment. The volume of voluntarily submitted reflections by learners was used to assess engagement and subsequent thematic analysis to assess feasibility of the techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The module was completed by 189 of the 197 students invited (95.9%). Engagement level was high with all completed students submitting reflections after self-debriefing, most of which (between 53.4% and 87.8%) were specific enough for thematic analysis. The main theme of reflections was \"missing something\" in the scenario, followed by the themes of importance of reading the patient monitor and refining actions and priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated the feasibility of the techniques based on cognitive engineering-inspired approaches for virtual simulation learning in health care that structures self-debriefing by comparing a learner's situation assessment and responses with those of experts. The techniques have the potential to help learners in health care efficiently and consistently develop key critical thinking skills, especially those based on tacit knowledge to detect cues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Online experiential learning can benefit learners with scalable techniques to self-debrief and to develop cognitive skills in recognizing clinical cues.

Methods: We developed techniques for cue-detection exercises and self-debriefing, based on cognitive engineering-inspired expertise development approaches that focus on tacit knowledge, sensemaking, and mental models. Self-debriefing was structured by asking the learners to compare and then reflect on their choices and rationales against those provided by a panel of experts. Using these techniques, we generated scenario-based experiential learning materials in a virtual environment for a 2-hour module on deteriorating patient conditions that can lead to imminent cardiac arrests. The module was tested in a senior nursing course as an optional assignment. The volume of voluntarily submitted reflections by learners was used to assess engagement and subsequent thematic analysis to assess feasibility of the techniques.

Results: The module was completed by 189 of the 197 students invited (95.9%). Engagement level was high with all completed students submitting reflections after self-debriefing, most of which (between 53.4% and 87.8%) were specific enough for thematic analysis. The main theme of reflections was "missing something" in the scenario, followed by the themes of importance of reading the patient monitor and refining actions and priorities.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of the techniques based on cognitive engineering-inspired approaches for virtual simulation learning in health care that structures self-debriefing by comparing a learner's situation assessment and responses with those of experts. The techniques have the potential to help learners in health care efficiently and consistently develop key critical thinking skills, especially those based on tacit knowledge to detect cues.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信