Effectiveness of Robot Care Intervention and Maintenance for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-12-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae110
Su-Jung Nam, Eun-Young Park
{"title":"Effectiveness of Robot Care Intervention and Maintenance for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Su-Jung Nam, Eun-Young Park","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robots have the potential to improve the quality of life of people with dementia. This study examined the effectiveness of robot care intervention and maintenance effect for people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Meta-analytical procedures were used to identify and synthesize articles for analysis. Coding procedures were used to record the moderators, including robot type, outcomes, intervention length, intervention duration, and intervention frequency. Hedge's <i>g</i> statistic was employed to interpret effect sizes and quantify individual research findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature review identified 20 eligible randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis results indicated an overall small effect of <i>g</i> = 0.286 for robot care intervention and <i>g</i> = 0.279 for robot care maintenance. Outcomes for robot care intervention indicated a small and significant effect size at <i>g</i> >0.2, whereas the Bomy robot type had an insignificant effect size. Outcomes for robot care maintenance showed a medium and significant effect size.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study confirmed the intervention effect of robot care on people with dementia and its sustainability for neuropsychiatric and social health outcomes. This highlights the effectiveness of humanoid-type robots in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 3","pages":"igae110"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Robots have the potential to improve the quality of life of people with dementia. This study examined the effectiveness of robot care intervention and maintenance effect for people with dementia.

Research design and methods: Meta-analytical procedures were used to identify and synthesize articles for analysis. Coding procedures were used to record the moderators, including robot type, outcomes, intervention length, intervention duration, and intervention frequency. Hedge's g statistic was employed to interpret effect sizes and quantify individual research findings.

Results: The literature review identified 20 eligible randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis results indicated an overall small effect of g = 0.286 for robot care intervention and g = 0.279 for robot care maintenance. Outcomes for robot care intervention indicated a small and significant effect size at g >0.2, whereas the Bomy robot type had an insignificant effect size. Outcomes for robot care maintenance showed a medium and significant effect size.

Discussion and implications: This study confirmed the intervention effect of robot care on people with dementia and its sustainability for neuropsychiatric and social health outcomes. This highlights the effectiveness of humanoid-type robots in dementia care.

机器人护理干预和维护对痴呆症患者的有效性:系统回顾和meta分析。
背景和目的:机器人有可能改善痴呆症患者的生活质量。本研究考察了机器人护理干预对痴呆患者的有效性和维持效果。研究设计和方法:采用荟萃分析方法对文章进行鉴定和合成。采用编码程序记录调节因子,包括机器人类型、结果、干预时长、干预持续时间和干预频率。赫奇的g统计量被用来解释效应大小和量化个别研究结果。结果:文献综述确定了20项符合条件的随机对照试验。meta分析结果显示,机器人护理干预的总体影响较小,g = 0.286,机器人护理维护的总体影响较小,g = 0.279。机器人护理干预的结果显示,效应量较小且显著,为g >0.2,而Bomy机器人类型的效应量不显著。机器人护理维护的结果显示中等和显著的效应量。讨论与启示:本研究证实了机器人护理对痴呆症患者的干预作用及其对神经精神和社会健康结果的可持续性。这凸显了类人机器人在痴呆症护理中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信