Meta-analysis to determine the effects of supplementation of niacin during the transition or lactating period on performance in dairy cows.

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
U Arshad, S Bagaria, C M Ncho, M Sagheer, K Krogstad, M Niu
{"title":"Meta-analysis to determine the effects of supplementation of niacin during the transition or lactating period on performance in dairy cows.","authors":"U Arshad, S Bagaria, C M Ncho, M Sagheer, K Krogstad, M Niu","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Niacin, a key component of pyridine nucleotides, plays a vital role in over 200 metabolic reactions, including carbohydrate, lipid, and AA metabolism. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of niacin supplementation on lactational performance in dairy cows. We hypothesized that niacin supplementation during the transition or lactating periods would enhance the productive performance of dairy cows. A systematic review identified 41 experiments, comprising 128 treatment means and 1,992 cows, which were included in the meta-analysis. Each experiment featured a non-supplemented control (CON) group and a supplemented group, with niacin provided as either rumen-unprotected niacin (RUPN) or rumen-protected niacin (RPN). Supplementation was initiated during either the transition or lactating period, resulting in the categorization of data into 4 distinct cohorts: cows supplemented with RUPN or RPN during either the transition or lactating periods. Cows supplemented with RUPN during the transition (CON; n = 13 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 14 treatment means) and lactating periods (CON; n = 33 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 40 treatment means) had average niacin intakes (mean ± SD) of 13.9 ± 10.8 g/d and 9.1 ± 3.5 g/d, respectively. Cows supplemented with RPN during the transition (CON; n = 4 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 4 treatment means) and lactating periods (CON; n = 8 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 12 treatment means) had niacin intakes of 11.7 ± 7.3 g/d and 4.6 ± 2.0 g/d, respectively. Mixed models were used to investigate the linear and quadratic effects of RUPN or RPN. Meta-analytical statistics in STATA estimated the weighted mean difference (WMD) of milk yield for treatment comparisons (CON vs. RUPN and CON vs. RPN). All models included the random effect of experiment and weighting by the inverse of the SEM squared. Supplementation of niacin, whether from RUPN or RPN, during the transition period did not improve performance in dairy cows. However, RUPN supplementation during the regular lactating period led to linear increases in DMI, yields of milk, ECM, protein and lactose, and increments of 0.50, 0.90, 0.70, 0.04, and 0.05 kg/d, respectively, were observed when cows were supplemented with 9.1 g/d RUPN. In 38 treatment comparisons from 20 experiments evaluating RUPN supplementation during the lactating period, the mean response indicated that RUPN cows produced 0.83 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.31), with moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 61.7%) heterogeneity observed. Similarly, RPN supplementation during the lactating period led to linear increases in DMI, yields of milk, ECM, fat and lactose, with respective increases of 0.60, 1.10, 0.70, 0.06, and 0.05 kg/d when cows were supplemented with 4.7 g/d niacin. Across 12 treatment comparisons from 8 experiments, RPN-supplemented cows produced 0.96 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.31), with no heterogeneity observed. Overall, feeding 9.1 g/d of niacin from RUPN or 4.7 g/d of niacin from RPN during the lactating period improved milk production without improving feed efficiency in dairy cows.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Niacin, a key component of pyridine nucleotides, plays a vital role in over 200 metabolic reactions, including carbohydrate, lipid, and AA metabolism. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of niacin supplementation on lactational performance in dairy cows. We hypothesized that niacin supplementation during the transition or lactating periods would enhance the productive performance of dairy cows. A systematic review identified 41 experiments, comprising 128 treatment means and 1,992 cows, which were included in the meta-analysis. Each experiment featured a non-supplemented control (CON) group and a supplemented group, with niacin provided as either rumen-unprotected niacin (RUPN) or rumen-protected niacin (RPN). Supplementation was initiated during either the transition or lactating period, resulting in the categorization of data into 4 distinct cohorts: cows supplemented with RUPN or RPN during either the transition or lactating periods. Cows supplemented with RUPN during the transition (CON; n = 13 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 14 treatment means) and lactating periods (CON; n = 33 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 40 treatment means) had average niacin intakes (mean ± SD) of 13.9 ± 10.8 g/d and 9.1 ± 3.5 g/d, respectively. Cows supplemented with RPN during the transition (CON; n = 4 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 4 treatment means) and lactating periods (CON; n = 8 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 12 treatment means) had niacin intakes of 11.7 ± 7.3 g/d and 4.6 ± 2.0 g/d, respectively. Mixed models were used to investigate the linear and quadratic effects of RUPN or RPN. Meta-analytical statistics in STATA estimated the weighted mean difference (WMD) of milk yield for treatment comparisons (CON vs. RUPN and CON vs. RPN). All models included the random effect of experiment and weighting by the inverse of the SEM squared. Supplementation of niacin, whether from RUPN or RPN, during the transition period did not improve performance in dairy cows. However, RUPN supplementation during the regular lactating period led to linear increases in DMI, yields of milk, ECM, protein and lactose, and increments of 0.50, 0.90, 0.70, 0.04, and 0.05 kg/d, respectively, were observed when cows were supplemented with 9.1 g/d RUPN. In 38 treatment comparisons from 20 experiments evaluating RUPN supplementation during the lactating period, the mean response indicated that RUPN cows produced 0.83 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.31), with moderate (I2 = 61.7%) heterogeneity observed. Similarly, RPN supplementation during the lactating period led to linear increases in DMI, yields of milk, ECM, fat and lactose, with respective increases of 0.60, 1.10, 0.70, 0.06, and 0.05 kg/d when cows were supplemented with 4.7 g/d niacin. Across 12 treatment comparisons from 8 experiments, RPN-supplemented cows produced 0.96 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.31), with no heterogeneity observed. Overall, feeding 9.1 g/d of niacin from RUPN or 4.7 g/d of niacin from RPN during the lactating period improved milk production without improving feed efficiency in dairy cows.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信