Analyzing news and research articles about energy storage systems in South Korea based on network analysis and topic modeling

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jaewon Jeoung, Juwon Hong, Jinwoo Choi, Taehoon Hong
{"title":"Analyzing news and research articles about energy storage systems in South Korea based on network analysis and topic modeling","authors":"Jaewon Jeoung,&nbsp;Juwon Hong,&nbsp;Jinwoo Choi,&nbsp;Taehoon Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The low adoption of energy storage systems (ESS) in South Korea reveals gaps among stakeholders such as government, industry, and academia, and between public and academic perspectives. This study analyzes 4,168 news articles and 9,120 research articles related to ESS in South Korea from 2010 to 2023, using trend analysis, co-occurrence network analysis, and topic modeling (BERTopic). Trend analysis showed that incentive-based policies significantly increased ESS installations and public interest. News article volume increased by 29.3% annually (2015–2018) with strong incentives, but by only 1.8% (2019–2022) after the reduction of these incentives, indicating that abrupt changes or the elimination of incentives decreased media coverage and slowed market growth. Network analysis revealed the industry sector as the most influential stakeholder in news articles, far exceeding academia with a weighted degree centrality 59 times higher and a betweenness centrality six times higher, reflecting the industry sector’s role in driving ESS-related discourse. Lastly, topic modeling identified media discourse on fire safety, electric vehicles, and recycling, whereas academic research focused on advances in ESS materials and operation systems, particularly for lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, and hydrogen or thermal energy storage systems. These findings indicate a misalignment between public concerns (electric vehicles, renewable energy, fire incidents, and waste management) and academic focus (material science and operation of ESS). Based on the results, strategies are proposed for each stakeholder, including maintaining long-term incentive-based policies, diversifying research and development investments for multiple ESS types, and improving communication of academic findings to better align public and academic discourses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 115547"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825002774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The low adoption of energy storage systems (ESS) in South Korea reveals gaps among stakeholders such as government, industry, and academia, and between public and academic perspectives. This study analyzes 4,168 news articles and 9,120 research articles related to ESS in South Korea from 2010 to 2023, using trend analysis, co-occurrence network analysis, and topic modeling (BERTopic). Trend analysis showed that incentive-based policies significantly increased ESS installations and public interest. News article volume increased by 29.3% annually (2015–2018) with strong incentives, but by only 1.8% (2019–2022) after the reduction of these incentives, indicating that abrupt changes or the elimination of incentives decreased media coverage and slowed market growth. Network analysis revealed the industry sector as the most influential stakeholder in news articles, far exceeding academia with a weighted degree centrality 59 times higher and a betweenness centrality six times higher, reflecting the industry sector’s role in driving ESS-related discourse. Lastly, topic modeling identified media discourse on fire safety, electric vehicles, and recycling, whereas academic research focused on advances in ESS materials and operation systems, particularly for lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, and hydrogen or thermal energy storage systems. These findings indicate a misalignment between public concerns (electric vehicles, renewable energy, fire incidents, and waste management) and academic focus (material science and operation of ESS). Based on the results, strategies are proposed for each stakeholder, including maintaining long-term incentive-based policies, diversifying research and development investments for multiple ESS types, and improving communication of academic findings to better align public and academic discourses.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信