Parental Motivational Beliefs Predict Science Learning Opportunities in Early Years

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mesut Saçkes, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Maria Shaheen
{"title":"Parental Motivational Beliefs Predict Science Learning Opportunities in Early Years","authors":"Mesut Saçkes, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Maria Shaheen","doi":"10.1007/s10643-025-01888-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined parents’ beliefs and potential links with their children’s (1) interest in science, (2) competence in learning science, and (3) science learning opportunities offered to their children. The study included a sample of 1,490 parents who had young children enrolled in U.S. preschool (3 years old, 55.9%) and pre-kindergarten (4 years old, 44.1%) classes. Data were collected via online surveys, which included three components: Perceived Science Motivation for Children-Parents Form, Parental Expectation and Support for Learning Science Questionnaire, and socio-demographic questions about parents and their children. Based on rankings of science and other curricular areas, parents’ responses were classified into three groups: Low, Moderate, and High Preference for Science. Few parents prioritized science over other curricular areas in early learning classrooms, and parents’ preferences for science were not associated with their incomes, levels of education, or the children’s ages or sex. Parents’ gender, however, was related to their preferences for science. Their beliefs about children’s interest in science and competence to learn science were associated with home science resources, science-related conversations, and parental preferences for learning science in early childhood classrooms. Results from this study suggest that parents’ beliefs about children’s interest in science and competence to learn science predict the science learning opportunities provided to their children.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01888-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined parents’ beliefs and potential links with their children’s (1) interest in science, (2) competence in learning science, and (3) science learning opportunities offered to their children. The study included a sample of 1,490 parents who had young children enrolled in U.S. preschool (3 years old, 55.9%) and pre-kindergarten (4 years old, 44.1%) classes. Data were collected via online surveys, which included three components: Perceived Science Motivation for Children-Parents Form, Parental Expectation and Support for Learning Science Questionnaire, and socio-demographic questions about parents and their children. Based on rankings of science and other curricular areas, parents’ responses were classified into three groups: Low, Moderate, and High Preference for Science. Few parents prioritized science over other curricular areas in early learning classrooms, and parents’ preferences for science were not associated with their incomes, levels of education, or the children’s ages or sex. Parents’ gender, however, was related to their preferences for science. Their beliefs about children’s interest in science and competence to learn science were associated with home science resources, science-related conversations, and parental preferences for learning science in early childhood classrooms. Results from this study suggest that parents’ beliefs about children’s interest in science and competence to learn science predict the science learning opportunities provided to their children.

父母动机信念预测幼儿科学学习机会
本研究考察了父母的信念及其与孩子(1)对科学的兴趣,(2)学习科学的能力,以及(3)为孩子提供的科学学习机会之间的潜在联系。该研究包括1490名父母的样本,他们的孩子在美国学前班(3岁,占55.9%)和学前班(4岁,占44.1%)上学。通过在线调查收集数据,该调查包括三个组成部分:儿童感知科学动机-父母表格,父母对学习科学的期望和支持问卷,以及关于父母及其子女的社会人口问题。根据科学和其他课程领域的排名,家长的反应被分为三组:低偏好、中等偏好和高偏好。在早期教育课堂中,很少有家长将科学置于其他课程领域之上,而且家长对科学的偏好与他们的收入、教育水平、孩子的年龄或性别无关。然而,父母的性别与他们对科学的偏好有关。他们认为儿童对科学的兴趣和学习科学的能力与家庭科学资源、与科学相关的对话和父母在幼儿课堂上学习科学的偏好有关。本研究结果显示,家长对孩子的科学兴趣和学习能力的信念,可以预测孩子所获得的科学学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Childhood Education Journal
Early Childhood Education Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children. Areas of Emphasis: International studies; Educational programs in diverse settings; Early learning across multiple domains; Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration; Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies; Best practices in early childhood teacher education; Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development; Family, school, and community relationships; Investigations related to curriculum and instruction; Articles that link theory and best practices; Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信