Economic Evaluations of Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Claire de Oliveira, Joyce Mason, Bahar Amani, Terri Rodak, Peter Szatmari, Jo Henderson, Darren B Courtney
{"title":"Economic Evaluations of Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Adolescents: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Claire de Oliveira, Joyce Mason, Bahar Amani, Terri Rodak, Peter Szatmari, Jo Henderson, Darren B Courtney","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Depressive disorders in adolescents are common and impairing. The objective of this review was to ascertain the existing literature on economic evaluations of treatments for adolescent depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsyclNFO, EconLit, and the International Health Technology Assessment Database from inception to May 2024 and the National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database from inception to December 2014. We included publications containing economic evaluations of clinical trials or model-based studies, which tested the treatment of depression in adolescents, regardless of jurisdiction. We extracted data, assessed the quality of reporting and methodology of all studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards and Quality of Health Economic Studies checklists, respectively, and used a narrative approach to synthesize findings by treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1381 records, we found 10 eligible studies. Two studies reported that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was cost-effective when compared with treatment as usual. Findings were mixed when combined CBT and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone because results were dependent on the applied willingness-to-pay thresholds (ie, the maximum price a decision maker is willing to pay for a given treatment). Overall, the quality of reporting and methodology was fairly high, although there were areas in which the studies could be improved upon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eight studies indicate that CBT, alone or in combination with other treatments, can be cost-effective for treating adolescent depression. Future economic evaluations should consider characterizing distributional effects, describing how uncertainty about analytic judgments, inputs, or projections affect study findings, undertaking equity subanalyses, and engaging with patients and others affected by the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.02.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Depressive disorders in adolescents are common and impairing. The objective of this review was to ascertain the existing literature on economic evaluations of treatments for adolescent depression.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsyclNFO, EconLit, and the International Health Technology Assessment Database from inception to May 2024 and the National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database from inception to December 2014. We included publications containing economic evaluations of clinical trials or model-based studies, which tested the treatment of depression in adolescents, regardless of jurisdiction. We extracted data, assessed the quality of reporting and methodology of all studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards and Quality of Health Economic Studies checklists, respectively, and used a narrative approach to synthesize findings by treatment.

Results: Among 1381 records, we found 10 eligible studies. Two studies reported that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was cost-effective when compared with treatment as usual. Findings were mixed when combined CBT and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone because results were dependent on the applied willingness-to-pay thresholds (ie, the maximum price a decision maker is willing to pay for a given treatment). Overall, the quality of reporting and methodology was fairly high, although there were areas in which the studies could be improved upon.

Conclusions: Eight studies indicate that CBT, alone or in combination with other treatments, can be cost-effective for treating adolescent depression. Future economic evaluations should consider characterizing distributional effects, describing how uncertainty about analytic judgments, inputs, or projections affect study findings, undertaking equity subanalyses, and engaging with patients and others affected by the study.

青少年抑郁症治疗的经济评价:范围综述。
背景:青少年抑郁症是一种常见且具有损害性的疾病。本综述的目的是确定现有文献对青少年抑郁症治疗的经济评价。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、PsyclNFO、EconLit、国际HTA数据库(成立至2024年5月)和NHS经济评估数据库(成立至2014年12月)。我们纳入了包含临床试验或基于模型的研究的经济评估的出版物,这些研究测试了青少年抑郁症的治疗,而不考虑司法管辖区。我们提取数据,分别使用CHEERS和QHES检查表评估所有研究的报告质量和方法,并采用叙述方法通过治疗综合研究结果。结果:在1381份记录中,我们找到10份符合条件的研究。两项研究报告称,与常规治疗相比,认知行为疗法(CBT)具有成本效益。当联合CBT和选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)与单独SSRIs进行比较时,结果是混合的,因为结果取决于所应用的支付意愿阈值(即决策者愿意为给定治疗支付的最高价格)。总的来说,报告和方法的质量相当高,尽管有些领域的研究可以加以改进。结论:8项研究表明,CBT单独或与其他治疗方法联合治疗青少年抑郁症具有成本效益。未来的经济评估应考虑分配效应的特征,描述分析判断、输入或预测的不确定性如何影响研究结果,进行公平性子分析,并与受研究影响的患者和其他人员进行接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信