Risk communication about high-dose MDMA: Impact of a hypothetical drug alert on future MDMA use.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Joel Keygan, Breanna Willoughby, Raimondo Bruno, Monica J Barratt, Amy Peacock
{"title":"Risk communication about high-dose MDMA: Impact of a hypothetical drug alert on future MDMA use.","authors":"Joel Keygan, Breanna Willoughby, Raimondo Bruno, Monica J Barratt, Amy Peacock","doi":"10.1111/dar.14037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite high-dose 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) drug alerts being distributed, no research has been conducted as to changes in use in response. This study aimed to determine if: (i) high-dose MDMA drug alerts, and (ii) varied descriptions of dose, effects and actions to reduce harm were associated with intentions to reduce the initial MDMA dose in a hypothetical scenario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Australians who used MDMA pills/capsules in the past year completed an online survey. Respondents were randomised into alert (n = 441) or control (n = 184) conditions, with the former receiving a high-dose MDMA alert with systematically varied descriptions of dose, effects and actions to reduce harm. Multinomial logistic regressions determined the association between receipt of drug alert (and varying alert content) and hypothetical MDMA dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half (45.4%) of those in any alert condition reported intention to not use (20.7% of control participants) and 46.7% stated they would use and reduce their initial dose (69.0% of control group). Compared to the control group, those who received an alert were significantly more likely to report intention to not use the drug, as compared to taking a smaller initial dose (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 3.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13, 5.07) or taking the same/higher initial dose (aRRR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.31, 5.22). There was no significant association between different alert phrasing and intended behaviour.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>While there was no significant effect of variation in phrasing, receipt of an alert promoted intended harm reduction behaviours. Future research assessing actual behaviour and different substances (e.g., heroin, methamphetamine) is important to further understand the utility of this public health communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.14037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite high-dose 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) drug alerts being distributed, no research has been conducted as to changes in use in response. This study aimed to determine if: (i) high-dose MDMA drug alerts, and (ii) varied descriptions of dose, effects and actions to reduce harm were associated with intentions to reduce the initial MDMA dose in a hypothetical scenario.

Methods: Australians who used MDMA pills/capsules in the past year completed an online survey. Respondents were randomised into alert (n = 441) or control (n = 184) conditions, with the former receiving a high-dose MDMA alert with systematically varied descriptions of dose, effects and actions to reduce harm. Multinomial logistic regressions determined the association between receipt of drug alert (and varying alert content) and hypothetical MDMA dosing.

Results: Almost half (45.4%) of those in any alert condition reported intention to not use (20.7% of control participants) and 46.7% stated they would use and reduce their initial dose (69.0% of control group). Compared to the control group, those who received an alert were significantly more likely to report intention to not use the drug, as compared to taking a smaller initial dose (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 3.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13, 5.07) or taking the same/higher initial dose (aRRR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.31, 5.22). There was no significant association between different alert phrasing and intended behaviour.

Discussion and conclusions: While there was no significant effect of variation in phrasing, receipt of an alert promoted intended harm reduction behaviours. Future research assessing actual behaviour and different substances (e.g., heroin, methamphetamine) is important to further understand the utility of this public health communication.

关于大剂量MDMA的风险沟通:假设性药物警报对未来MDMA使用的影响。
导读:尽管分发了大剂量3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)药物警报,但尚未进行有关使用变化的研究。本研究旨在确定:(i)高剂量MDMA药物警报,(ii)在假设情况下,剂量、效应和减少伤害的行动的不同描述是否与减少初始MDMA剂量的意图有关。方法:在过去一年中使用过MDMA药丸/胶囊的澳大利亚人完成了一项在线调查。调查对象被随机分为警报组(n = 441)和对照组(n = 184),前者接受高剂量MDMA警报,并系统地描述剂量、效果和减少危害的措施。多项逻辑回归确定了收到药物警报(以及不同的警报内容)与假设的MDMA剂量之间的关系。结果:几乎一半(45.4%)处于任何警戒状态的人报告不打算使用(对照组的20.7%),46.7%的人表示他们会使用并减少初始剂量(对照组的69.0%)。与对照组相比,与服用较小的初始剂量(校正相对风险比[aRRR] = 3.28, 95%可信区间[CI] 2.13, 5.07)或服用相同/更高的初始剂量(aRRR = 2.62, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.31, 5.22)相比,收到警报的患者更有可能报告不打算使用该药物。不同的警告措辞和预期行为之间没有显著的联系。讨论和结论:虽然措辞变化没有显著影响,但收到警报促进了有意减少伤害的行为。评估实际行为和不同物质(如海洛因、甲基苯丙胺)的未来研究对于进一步了解这种公共卫生交流的效用非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信