Understanding social media discourse on antidepressants: unsupervised and sentiment analysis using X.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Javier Goena, Francisco Lara, María Montero Torres, Julen Marin Napal, Rodrigo Muñoz, Cielo García Montero, Oscar Fraile Martínez, Miguel Ángel Ortega, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Ana González Pinto, Javier Quintero, Melchor Alvarez-Mon, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon
{"title":"Understanding social media discourse on antidepressants: unsupervised and sentiment analysis using X.","authors":"Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Javier Goena, Francisco Lara, María Montero Torres, Julen Marin Napal, Rodrigo Muñoz, Cielo García Montero, Oscar Fraile Martínez, Miguel Ángel Ortega, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Ana González Pinto, Javier Quintero, Melchor Alvarez-Mon, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressants are essential in managing depression, including treatment-resistant cases. Public perceptions of these medications, shaped by social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), can influence treatment adherence and outcomes. This study explores public attitudes toward antidepressants through sentiment and topic modeling analysis of tweets in English and Spanish from 2007 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tweets mentioning antidepressants approved for depression were collected. The analysis focused on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and glutamatergic drugs. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling were conducted to identify trends, concerns, and emotions in discussions across both languages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,448,674 tweets were analyzed (1,013,128 in English and 435,546 in Spanish). SSRIs were the most mentioned antidepressants (27.9% in English, 58.91% in Spanish). Pricing and availability were key concerns in English tweets, while Spanish tweets highlighted availability, efficacy, and sexual side effects. Glutamatergic drugs, especially esketamine, gained attention (15.61% in English, 25.23% in Spanish), evoking emotions such as fear, sadness, and anger. Temporal analysis showed significant increases in discussions, with peaks in 2012 and 2021 for SSRIs in Spanish, and exponential growth from 2018 to 2021 for glutamatergic drugs. Emotional tones varied across languages, reflecting cultural differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media platforms like X provide valuable insights into public perceptions of antidepressants, highlighting cultural variations in attitudes. Understanding these perceptions can help clinicians address concerns and misconceptions, fostering informed treatment decisions. The limitations of social media data call for careful interpretation, emphasizing the need for continued research to improve pharmacovigilance and public health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e51"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antidepressants are essential in managing depression, including treatment-resistant cases. Public perceptions of these medications, shaped by social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), can influence treatment adherence and outcomes. This study explores public attitudes toward antidepressants through sentiment and topic modeling analysis of tweets in English and Spanish from 2007 to 2022.

Methods: Tweets mentioning antidepressants approved for depression were collected. The analysis focused on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and glutamatergic drugs. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling were conducted to identify trends, concerns, and emotions in discussions across both languages.

Results: A total of 1,448,674 tweets were analyzed (1,013,128 in English and 435,546 in Spanish). SSRIs were the most mentioned antidepressants (27.9% in English, 58.91% in Spanish). Pricing and availability were key concerns in English tweets, while Spanish tweets highlighted availability, efficacy, and sexual side effects. Glutamatergic drugs, especially esketamine, gained attention (15.61% in English, 25.23% in Spanish), evoking emotions such as fear, sadness, and anger. Temporal analysis showed significant increases in discussions, with peaks in 2012 and 2021 for SSRIs in Spanish, and exponential growth from 2018 to 2021 for glutamatergic drugs. Emotional tones varied across languages, reflecting cultural differences.

Conclusions: Social media platforms like X provide valuable insights into public perceptions of antidepressants, highlighting cultural variations in attitudes. Understanding these perceptions can help clinicians address concerns and misconceptions, fostering informed treatment decisions. The limitations of social media data call for careful interpretation, emphasizing the need for continued research to improve pharmacovigilance and public health strategies.

理解抗抑郁药物的社交媒体话语:使用X的无监督和情绪分析。
背景:抗抑郁药在治疗抑郁症,包括治疗难治性病例中是必不可少的。公众对这些药物的看法是由X(以前的Twitter)等社交媒体平台塑造的,可以影响治疗的依从性和结果。本研究通过对2007年至2022年英语和西班牙语推文的情绪和主题建模分析,探讨了公众对抗抑郁药的态度。方法:收集提及抗抑郁药物的推文。分析的重点是选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和谷氨酸能药物。进行情感分析和主题建模,以确定两种语言讨论中的趋势、关注点和情绪。结果:共分析了1,448,674条推文(1,013,128条英文推文和435,546条西班牙文推文)。SSRIs是被提及最多的抗抑郁药物(英语为27.9%,西班牙语为58.91%)。价格和可用性是英语推特的主要关注点,而西班牙语推特则强调了可用性、功效和性副作用。谷氨酸能药物,尤其是艾氯胺酮,引起了人们的关注(英语为15.61%,西班牙语为25.23%),引起人们的情绪,如恐惧、悲伤和愤怒。时间分析显示,讨论量显著增加,西班牙语中ssri类药物的讨论量在2012年和2021年达到峰值,而谷氨酸类药物的讨论量在2018年至2021年呈指数增长。不同语言的情绪语调各不相同,反映了文化差异。结论:像X这样的社交媒体平台为公众对抗抑郁药的看法提供了有价值的见解,突出了态度上的文化差异。了解这些看法可以帮助临床医生解决问题和误解,促进明智的治疗决策。社交媒体数据的局限性要求仔细解释,强调需要继续研究以改善药物警戒和公共卫生战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信