Emily C Farrer, Nelle K Kulick, Christina Birnbaum, Susannah Halbrook, Caitlin R Bumby, Claire Willis
{"title":"Environmental and host plant effects on taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of root fungal endophytes.","authors":"Emily C Farrer, Nelle K Kulick, Christina Birnbaum, Susannah Halbrook, Caitlin R Bumby, Claire Willis","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nearly all plants are colonized by fungal endophytes, and a growing body of work shows that both environment and host species shape plant-associated fungal communities. However, few studies place their work in a phylogenetic context to understand endophyte community assembly through an evolutionary lens. Here, we investigated environmental and host effects on root endophyte assemblages in coastal Louisiana marshes. We isolated and sequenced culturable fungal endophytes from roots of three to four dominant plant species from each of three sites of varying salinity. We assessed taxonomic diversity and composition as well as phylogenetic diversity (mean phylogenetic distance, MPD) and phylogenetic composition (based on MPD). When we analyzed plant hosts present across the entire gradient, we found that the effect of the environment on phylogenetic diversity (as measured by MPD) was host dependent and suggested phylogenetic clustering in some circumstances. We found that both environment and host plant affected taxonomic composition of fungal endophytes, but only host plant affected phylogenetic composition, suggesting different host plants selected for fungal taxa drawn from distinct phylogenetic clades, whereas environmental assemblages were drawn from similar clades. Our study demonstrates that including phylogenetic, as well as taxonomic, community metrics can provide a deeper understanding of community assembly in endophytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaf030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nearly all plants are colonized by fungal endophytes, and a growing body of work shows that both environment and host species shape plant-associated fungal communities. However, few studies place their work in a phylogenetic context to understand endophyte community assembly through an evolutionary lens. Here, we investigated environmental and host effects on root endophyte assemblages in coastal Louisiana marshes. We isolated and sequenced culturable fungal endophytes from roots of three to four dominant plant species from each of three sites of varying salinity. We assessed taxonomic diversity and composition as well as phylogenetic diversity (mean phylogenetic distance, MPD) and phylogenetic composition (based on MPD). When we analyzed plant hosts present across the entire gradient, we found that the effect of the environment on phylogenetic diversity (as measured by MPD) was host dependent and suggested phylogenetic clustering in some circumstances. We found that both environment and host plant affected taxonomic composition of fungal endophytes, but only host plant affected phylogenetic composition, suggesting different host plants selected for fungal taxa drawn from distinct phylogenetic clades, whereas environmental assemblages were drawn from similar clades. Our study demonstrates that including phylogenetic, as well as taxonomic, community metrics can provide a deeper understanding of community assembly in endophytes.
期刊介绍:
FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered.
2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020)
Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology)
The journal is divided into eight Sections:
Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies)
Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens)
Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology
Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses)
Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies)
Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea)
Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature)
Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology)
If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.