Application of Mini-CEX Evaluation Combined With Segmented Teaching Approach in the Training of Surgical Clinical Practice Skills for Resident Physicians

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Chao Liu MMed , Mei Ren MMed , Chaoen Luo MMed , Khan Asfandyar MMed , Jia Liu MMed , Dan Chen MD , Zhengwen Lei MD
{"title":"Application of Mini-CEX Evaluation Combined With Segmented Teaching Approach in the Training of Surgical Clinical Practice Skills for Resident Physicians","authors":"Chao Liu MMed ,&nbsp;Mei Ren MMed ,&nbsp;Chaoen Luo MMed ,&nbsp;Khan Asfandyar MMed ,&nbsp;Jia Liu MMed ,&nbsp;Dan Chen MD ,&nbsp;Zhengwen Lei MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of integrating Mini-CEX assessment with Segmented teaching on the improvement of surgical clinical practice skills among first-year resident physicians, and to compare its effectiveness with traditional teaching methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 42 first-year resident physicians undergoing standardized training at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China from April to June 2024, who were participating in surgical clinical practice skills training for excision of superficial tumors, were selected as subjects. The participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: an experimental group and a control group, with 21 participants in each. The control group employed traditional teaching methods, while the experimental group utilized the Mini-CEX assessment combined with Segmented teaching methods. Both groups were assessed on their practical skills, theoretical knowledge, Mini-CEX evaluations, and Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) before and after the training, and their results were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no statistically significant differences in practical skills and theoretical knowledge scores between the experimental and control groups before training (p &lt; 0.05). However, after the training, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group in theoretical and practical exams, Mini-CEX evaluation dimensions, and SEEQ teaching quality assessment scores, with statistically significant differences (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combination of Mini-CEX assessment with Segmented teaching methods can achieve better training outcomes in surgical clinical practice skills training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 5","pages":"Article 103497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of integrating Mini-CEX assessment with Segmented teaching on the improvement of surgical clinical practice skills among first-year resident physicians, and to compare its effectiveness with traditional teaching methods.

Methods

A total of 42 first-year resident physicians undergoing standardized training at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China from April to June 2024, who were participating in surgical clinical practice skills training for excision of superficial tumors, were selected as subjects. The participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: an experimental group and a control group, with 21 participants in each. The control group employed traditional teaching methods, while the experimental group utilized the Mini-CEX assessment combined with Segmented teaching methods. Both groups were assessed on their practical skills, theoretical knowledge, Mini-CEX evaluations, and Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) before and after the training, and their results were compared.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in practical skills and theoretical knowledge scores between the experimental and control groups before training (p < 0.05). However, after the training, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group in theoretical and practical exams, Mini-CEX evaluation dimensions, and SEEQ teaching quality assessment scores, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of Mini-CEX assessment with Segmented teaching methods can achieve better training outcomes in surgical clinical practice skills training.
Mini-CEX评价结合分段教学法在住院医师外科临床实践技能培训中的应用
目的评价Mini-CEX考核与分段教学相结合对第一年住院医师外科临床实践技能提高的影响,并与传统教学方法进行比较。方法选择2024年4 - 6月在华南大学衡阳医学院第一附属医院接受规范化培训的一年级住院医师42名,参加浅表肿瘤切除手术临床实践技能培训。参与者被随机分为两组:实验组和对照组,每组21人。对照组采用传统教学方法,实验组采用Mini-CEX评估结合分段教学方法。对两组学生在培训前后的实践技能、理论知识、Mini-CEX评价、学生教育质量评价(SEEQ)进行评估,并对结果进行比较。结果实验组与对照组在训练前的实践技能和理论知识得分比较,差异均无统计学意义(p <; 0.05)。但经过培训后,实验组在理论和实践考试、Mini-CEX评价维度、SEEQ教学质量评价得分均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(p <; 0.05)。结论在外科临床实践技能培训中,将Mini-CEX评估与分段式教学相结合可取得较好的培训效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信