Bus user itinerary choice: Can crowding information help shift riders?

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Long Pan , E.O.D. Waygood , Zachary Patterson
{"title":"Bus user itinerary choice: Can crowding information help shift riders?","authors":"Long Pan ,&nbsp;E.O.D. Waygood ,&nbsp;Zachary Patterson","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the challenges posed by the unbalanced distribution of ridership on public transit, which often leads to issues such as bus overcrowding and bunching. We investigated the influence of crowding information on public transit users’ decisions to switch to less crowded itineraries. By conducting a Discrete Choice Experiment, we gathered data from transit users to estimate a mixed logit model, analyzing how various factors impact itinerary choice behavior. The results indicate that bus crowding information, alongside context information, service details of the itinerary, and incentives significantly affect users’ choices. Specifically, crowding information has a notable statistical impact on the decision-making process, depending on the proposed itinerary mode. For example, when the proposed mode is a bus, respondents show a preference for itineraries with more available seats (odds ratio = 1.058 per seat). Conversely, in scenarios involving a shared taxi, respondents are less inclined to switch if traveling with co-riders (odds ratio = 0.693). The study also quantifies the trade-offs among crowding information, service information, and incentives. Our findings provide insights that can assist public transit operators in managing demand more effectively, potentially enhancing operational efficiency and reducing costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the challenges posed by the unbalanced distribution of ridership on public transit, which often leads to issues such as bus overcrowding and bunching. We investigated the influence of crowding information on public transit users’ decisions to switch to less crowded itineraries. By conducting a Discrete Choice Experiment, we gathered data from transit users to estimate a mixed logit model, analyzing how various factors impact itinerary choice behavior. The results indicate that bus crowding information, alongside context information, service details of the itinerary, and incentives significantly affect users’ choices. Specifically, crowding information has a notable statistical impact on the decision-making process, depending on the proposed itinerary mode. For example, when the proposed mode is a bus, respondents show a preference for itineraries with more available seats (odds ratio = 1.058 per seat). Conversely, in scenarios involving a shared taxi, respondents are less inclined to switch if traveling with co-riders (odds ratio = 0.693). The study also quantifies the trade-offs among crowding information, service information, and incentives. Our findings provide insights that can assist public transit operators in managing demand more effectively, potentially enhancing operational efficiency and reducing costs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信