BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez, Valeria Bortolaia, Sara Bover-Cid, Wietske Dohmen, Laurent Guillier, Lieve Herman, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Maarten Nauta, Jakob Ottoson, Luisa Peixe, Fernando Perez-Rodriguez, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, John Griffin, Pablo Fernández Escámez, Carolina Baptista, Sandra Correia, Alessandra De Cesare
{"title":"BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down","authors":"EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ),&nbsp;Ana Allende,&nbsp;Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez,&nbsp;Valeria Bortolaia,&nbsp;Sara Bover-Cid,&nbsp;Wietske Dohmen,&nbsp;Laurent Guillier,&nbsp;Lieve Herman,&nbsp;Liesbeth Jacxsens,&nbsp;Lapo Mughini-Gras,&nbsp;Maarten Nauta,&nbsp;Jakob Ottoson,&nbsp;Luisa Peixe,&nbsp;Fernando Perez-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Panagiotis Skandamis,&nbsp;Elisabetta Suffredini,&nbsp;John Griffin,&nbsp;Pablo Fernández Escámez,&nbsp;Carolina Baptista,&nbsp;Sandra Correia,&nbsp;Alessandra De Cesare","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> Senftenberg by at least 5 log<sub>10</sub> and the infectious titre of <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> by at least 3 log<sub>10</sub>. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log<sub>10</sub> reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of <i>E. faecalis</i> by dry heating. For <i>S</i>. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log<sub>10</sub> reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction of <i>E. faecalis</i> using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of <i>S.</i> Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae,</i> it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log<sub>10</sub> reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg by at least 5 log10 and the infectious titre of Anelloviridae and Circoviridae by at least 3 log10. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log10 reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of E. faecalis by dry heating. For S. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log10 reduction. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log10 reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log10 reduction of E. faecalis using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of S. Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae, it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log10 reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.

Abstract Image

BIOHAZ对羽毛和羽绒的替代热处理工艺等效性的科学意见
欧盟委员会要求EFSA就羽毛和羽绒的干热热处理工艺在100°C温度下持续30分钟与委员会法规(EU) No 142/2011中规定的处理在相关病原体灭活方面的等效性提供科学意见。要被认为至少等同于立法中的方法,替代方法应能够将粪肠球菌或森夫腾堡沙门氏菌的浓度降低至少5 log10,并将无线虫科和圆环病毒科的感染性滴度降低至少3 log10。进行了广泛的文献检索(ELS),以确定在低水分/水活度的基质中干热后确定指标的log10减少或D值的研究。ELS未对干热法灭活粪肠杆菌进行研究。对于S. Senftenberg来说,没有明确的数据表明减少了5 log10。对于无绒病毒科和圆环病毒科,证据有限,只有一项研究报告在120°C下加热30分钟后减少1 log10。鉴于现有的数据和不确定性的来源,由于缺乏证据,不可能得出使用所提出的方法粪肠球菌减少5 log10的结论。同样,由于证据相互矛盾,也无法得出S. Senftenberg的可比减少。对于Anelloviridae和Circoviridae,不可能得出用所提出的方法减少3 log10的结论,因为只有一项关于干热的研究被检索到,没有证明这样的减少。因此,根据迄今为止的数据,在100°C下对羽毛和羽绒进行30分钟的干热处理,就相关病原体的失活而言,不能被视为等同于法规中规定的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信