Ankita Bhattashali, Gregory A. Cheatham, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Jisun R. Oh, Gospel Kim
{"title":"Overcoming Bias in ECSE by Incorporating Funds of Knowledge in Teacher Preparation","authors":"Ankita Bhattashali, Gregory A. Cheatham, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Jisun R. Oh, Gospel Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10643-025-01886-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Child developmental milestones are deeply rooted in Western developmental theory and, therefore, cannot be assumed to generalize to culturally and racially minoritized (CRM) children and families, including those who are from international backgrounds. When developmental milestones are exclusively used to assess children’s development and make decisions about child goals, Early Childhood Education (ECE) and Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) practitioners may perpetuate unconscious bias by favoring Western expectations of child development. This can have negative consequences for children and families who are CRM. For example, children can be misdiagnosed with delays and continuing disproportionality in ECSE. To address this problem, we propose strategies to prepare ECE/ECSE preservice teachers to counter biases towards children from CRM backgrounds. In this conceptual paper with an emphasis on practical strategies, we provide an overarching framework of Funds of Knowledge [FoK; Esteban-Guitart and Moll, Cult Psychol 20(1):31–48, 2014] that can be incorporated into a preservice teacher preparation program. Next, we propose the following practical strategies aligned with FoK, which can be included in preservice teacher education: (1) assigning mentor families from CRM backgrounds to support preservice teachers learning about developing meaningful partnerships with families and (2) embedding opportunities for social identity mapping (Jacobson and Mustafa, Int J Qual Methods 18:1–12, 2019), a practice that prompts preservice teachers to reflect on their assumptions and biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01886-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Child developmental milestones are deeply rooted in Western developmental theory and, therefore, cannot be assumed to generalize to culturally and racially minoritized (CRM) children and families, including those who are from international backgrounds. When developmental milestones are exclusively used to assess children’s development and make decisions about child goals, Early Childhood Education (ECE) and Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) practitioners may perpetuate unconscious bias by favoring Western expectations of child development. This can have negative consequences for children and families who are CRM. For example, children can be misdiagnosed with delays and continuing disproportionality in ECSE. To address this problem, we propose strategies to prepare ECE/ECSE preservice teachers to counter biases towards children from CRM backgrounds. In this conceptual paper with an emphasis on practical strategies, we provide an overarching framework of Funds of Knowledge [FoK; Esteban-Guitart and Moll, Cult Psychol 20(1):31–48, 2014] that can be incorporated into a preservice teacher preparation program. Next, we propose the following practical strategies aligned with FoK, which can be included in preservice teacher education: (1) assigning mentor families from CRM backgrounds to support preservice teachers learning about developing meaningful partnerships with families and (2) embedding opportunities for social identity mapping (Jacobson and Mustafa, Int J Qual Methods 18:1–12, 2019), a practice that prompts preservice teachers to reflect on their assumptions and biases.
期刊介绍:
Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children.
Areas of Emphasis:
International studies;
Educational programs in diverse settings;
Early learning across multiple domains;
Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration;
Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies;
Best practices in early childhood teacher education;
Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development;
Family, school, and community relationships;
Investigations related to curriculum and instruction;
Articles that link theory and best practices;
Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field