How does global agricultural research and innovation cooperation influence agricultural R&I system transformation in the South? Evidence from UK-China cooperation

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Bin Wu , Cong Cao , Simon Mosey , Tim Daniell , Peter Noy , Yizhe Cui , Min Rose , Jonathan Snape
{"title":"How does global agricultural research and innovation cooperation influence agricultural R&I system transformation in the South? Evidence from UK-China cooperation","authors":"Bin Wu ,&nbsp;Cong Cao ,&nbsp;Simon Mosey ,&nbsp;Tim Daniell ,&nbsp;Peter Noy ,&nbsp;Yizhe Cui ,&nbsp;Min Rose ,&nbsp;Jonathan Snape","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The need for agri-food system transformation has sparked extensive debates on reconfiguring the agricultural research and innovation system (ARIS) to tackle the multidimensional and interwoven challenges present across geographies and scales. This paper highlights the emergence of China, India and Brazil, and their increasing influence on ARIS in the South. We conceptualise global agricultural R&amp;I cooperation (ARIC) to examine how the changing nature of the cooperation between major players from the North and the South influences ARIS transformation in the South. We propose a local–global nexus (LGN) framework to reveal multiple processes involving researchers and non-academic actors for joint knowledge production and social impact across scales. We explore LGN’s feasibility through a case study of UK-China cooperation to illustrate the necessity and key factors influencing the participation of non-academic actors including smallholder farmers in ARIC. Evidence for this paper comes from a combination of primary data collected from 52 British scientists, representatives of funding agencies and entrepreneurs regarding their experiences, opinions and perceptions of ARIC through bilateral cooperation, and second sources. This paper contributes to ARIS transformation debates from three perspectives. First, it sheds new light on transformative innovation debates by adding an ARIC element for ARIS transformation in the South. Second, it enriches a “pathways approach” by delineating four pathways of ARIC, as well as top-down and bottom-up processes across various scales. Third, it offers an LGN framework for ARIC research to address the complexity, diversity and opportunities for ARIS transformation towards sustainable and equitable agri-food systems in the South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 102813"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922500017X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for agri-food system transformation has sparked extensive debates on reconfiguring the agricultural research and innovation system (ARIS) to tackle the multidimensional and interwoven challenges present across geographies and scales. This paper highlights the emergence of China, India and Brazil, and their increasing influence on ARIS in the South. We conceptualise global agricultural R&I cooperation (ARIC) to examine how the changing nature of the cooperation between major players from the North and the South influences ARIS transformation in the South. We propose a local–global nexus (LGN) framework to reveal multiple processes involving researchers and non-academic actors for joint knowledge production and social impact across scales. We explore LGN’s feasibility through a case study of UK-China cooperation to illustrate the necessity and key factors influencing the participation of non-academic actors including smallholder farmers in ARIC. Evidence for this paper comes from a combination of primary data collected from 52 British scientists, representatives of funding agencies and entrepreneurs regarding their experiences, opinions and perceptions of ARIC through bilateral cooperation, and second sources. This paper contributes to ARIS transformation debates from three perspectives. First, it sheds new light on transformative innovation debates by adding an ARIC element for ARIS transformation in the South. Second, it enriches a “pathways approach” by delineating four pathways of ARIC, as well as top-down and bottom-up processes across various scales. Third, it offers an LGN framework for ARIC research to address the complexity, diversity and opportunities for ARIS transformation towards sustainable and equitable agri-food systems in the South.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信