Self-adaptive over progressive non-adaptive immersive virtual reality serious game to promote motor learning in older adults – A double blind randomized controlled trial

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Gauthier Everard , Madeleine Vermette , Elizabeth Dumas-Longpré , Teresa Hoang , Megann Robitaille , Gregorio Sorrentino , Martin Gareth Edwards , Thierry Lejeune , Charles Sebiyo Batcho
{"title":"Self-adaptive over progressive non-adaptive immersive virtual reality serious game to promote motor learning in older adults – A double blind randomized controlled trial","authors":"Gauthier Everard ,&nbsp;Madeleine Vermette ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Dumas-Longpré ,&nbsp;Teresa Hoang ,&nbsp;Megann Robitaille ,&nbsp;Gregorio Sorrentino ,&nbsp;Martin Gareth Edwards ,&nbsp;Thierry Lejeune ,&nbsp;Charles Sebiyo Batcho","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Older adults often experience cognitive and functional decline, which can be mitigated by innovative interventions like immersive virtual reality (iVR). Self-adaptive serious games, which dynamically adjust task difficulty, may provide additional benefits by tailoring challenges to individual performance. However, the comparative effectiveness of self-adaptive versus progressive non-adaptive iVR interventions on motor learning in older adults remains underexplored. This randomized controlled trial primarily aimed to compare the effects of self-adaptive and progressive non-adaptive iVR interventions on motor learning in older adults. A total of 33 older adults were randomly assigned to either a self-adaptive (n = 17) or progressive non-adaptive (n = 16) iVR group. Both interventions involved an iVR serious game requiring unimanual reaching, target selection, and distractor inhibition under increasing difficulty over three days. Performance was evaluated pre- and post-intervention using a standardized iVR task, consisting of hitting a virtual target while ignoring distractors. This task features five levels of difficulty (level 0: no distractors; level 4: 17 low-saliency distractors). Primary outcomes, assessed during the standardized task, included changes in speed-accuracy trade-offs (SAT) and relative response time (RT, compared to level 0). Both participants and assessors were blinded to the intervention. After the intervention, both groups exhibited significant SAT improvements at level 1, 3 and 4 (P &lt; 0.05) and RT gains at level 3 and 4 (P &lt; 0.05). The self-adaptive group demonstrated significantly greater SAT (P = 0.049) and relative RT (P = 0.004) improvements at level 4. Findings suggest that older adults can achieve motor learning in iVR, particularly with self-adaptive serious games, highlighting potential for self-rehabilitation. Clinical trial NCT06141642 approved the 21th November 2023.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"571 ","pages":"Pages 7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645222500171X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults often experience cognitive and functional decline, which can be mitigated by innovative interventions like immersive virtual reality (iVR). Self-adaptive serious games, which dynamically adjust task difficulty, may provide additional benefits by tailoring challenges to individual performance. However, the comparative effectiveness of self-adaptive versus progressive non-adaptive iVR interventions on motor learning in older adults remains underexplored. This randomized controlled trial primarily aimed to compare the effects of self-adaptive and progressive non-adaptive iVR interventions on motor learning in older adults. A total of 33 older adults were randomly assigned to either a self-adaptive (n = 17) or progressive non-adaptive (n = 16) iVR group. Both interventions involved an iVR serious game requiring unimanual reaching, target selection, and distractor inhibition under increasing difficulty over three days. Performance was evaluated pre- and post-intervention using a standardized iVR task, consisting of hitting a virtual target while ignoring distractors. This task features five levels of difficulty (level 0: no distractors; level 4: 17 low-saliency distractors). Primary outcomes, assessed during the standardized task, included changes in speed-accuracy trade-offs (SAT) and relative response time (RT, compared to level 0). Both participants and assessors were blinded to the intervention. After the intervention, both groups exhibited significant SAT improvements at level 1, 3 and 4 (P < 0.05) and RT gains at level 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). The self-adaptive group demonstrated significantly greater SAT (P = 0.049) and relative RT (P = 0.004) improvements at level 4. Findings suggest that older adults can achieve motor learning in iVR, particularly with self-adaptive serious games, highlighting potential for self-rehabilitation. Clinical trial NCT06141642 approved the 21th November 2023.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信