Who is the “Ideal Surgical Trainee?”: A Qualitative Analysis of Letters of Recommendation to Subspecialty Surgical Fellowship

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jonathan S. Abelson MD, MS , Ali Al Jabri MD , Hina Bhat MD , Elizabeth M. Breen MD , Angela H. Kuhnen MD , Sharon L. Stein MD , Emily Steinhagen MD , Julia T. Saraidaridis MD, MMSc
{"title":"Who is the “Ideal Surgical Trainee?”: A Qualitative Analysis of Letters of Recommendation to Subspecialty Surgical Fellowship","authors":"Jonathan S. Abelson MD, MS ,&nbsp;Ali Al Jabri MD ,&nbsp;Hina Bhat MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Breen MD ,&nbsp;Angela H. Kuhnen MD ,&nbsp;Sharon L. Stein MD ,&nbsp;Emily Steinhagen MD ,&nbsp;Julia T. Saraidaridis MD, MMSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>It is unknown what traits practicing surgeons value in those wishing to become colorectal surgeons. The objective of this study was determine the most common qualities used to describe applicants to colorectal surgery residency.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Letters of a recommendation (LOR) qualitatively analyzed to determine how writers described applicants. Letters were analyzed, coded, and categorized to understand the qualities most admired and devalued by reviewers.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>LOR submitted to Lahey Hospital and Medical Center in Massachusetts</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>111 applicants to colorectal surgery residency at Lahey during the 2019 to 2020 cycle including 658 letters and 409 letter writers. There were 315 standardized LOR and 343 narrative LOR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>75% of letters described some aspect of “grindstone” or hard-working attributes as being a positive. Other LORs valued attributes including being likeable and having good clinical and technical skills. The most frequent applicant flaws identified in the LOR included poor leadership skills and lack of delegation skills. Several letter writers also expressed concerns when an applicant was too soft spoken.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study codifies the qualities valued by letter writers in describing colorectal surgery applicants. The descriptors used by surgeons in LOR can be thought of as a portrayal of the qualities composing an “ideal surgical trainee.” This cohort of LOR emphasized grindstone characteristics as a positive and poor leadership as a negative. As work-life integration becomes increasingly important to early career surgeons, intergenerational conflict may arise if the qualities lauded in the “ideal applicant” focus on work at all cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 5","pages":"Article 103479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

It is unknown what traits practicing surgeons value in those wishing to become colorectal surgeons. The objective of this study was determine the most common qualities used to describe applicants to colorectal surgery residency.

Design

Letters of a recommendation (LOR) qualitatively analyzed to determine how writers described applicants. Letters were analyzed, coded, and categorized to understand the qualities most admired and devalued by reviewers.

Setting

LOR submitted to Lahey Hospital and Medical Center in Massachusetts

Participants

111 applicants to colorectal surgery residency at Lahey during the 2019 to 2020 cycle including 658 letters and 409 letter writers. There were 315 standardized LOR and 343 narrative LOR.

Results

75% of letters described some aspect of “grindstone” or hard-working attributes as being a positive. Other LORs valued attributes including being likeable and having good clinical and technical skills. The most frequent applicant flaws identified in the LOR included poor leadership skills and lack of delegation skills. Several letter writers also expressed concerns when an applicant was too soft spoken.

Conclusions

This study codifies the qualities valued by letter writers in describing colorectal surgery applicants. The descriptors used by surgeons in LOR can be thought of as a portrayal of the qualities composing an “ideal surgical trainee.” This cohort of LOR emphasized grindstone characteristics as a positive and poor leadership as a negative. As work-life integration becomes increasingly important to early career surgeons, intergenerational conflict may arise if the qualities lauded in the “ideal applicant” focus on work at all cost.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信