[Examination of Simultaneous Extraction Method of 19 Food Additives in Processed Foods].

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Tomoki Igarashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Mari Morikawa, Keiko Ushiyama, Chigusa Kobayashi, Yukiko Yamajima, Yuki Sadamasu, Kenji Otsuka
{"title":"[Examination of Simultaneous Extraction Method of 19 Food Additives in Processed Foods].","authors":"Tomoki Igarashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Mari Morikawa, Keiko Ushiyama, Chigusa Kobayashi, Yukiko Yamajima, Yuki Sadamasu, Kenji Otsuka","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.66.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we developed a simultaneous extraction method for 19 food additives, including sweeteners, preservatives, and antioxidants, to enhance testing efficiency across a wide range of processed foods. Samples underwent 2 or 4 extractions with acetonitrile containing 0.05 w/v% ascorbic acid palmitate, facilitated by the addition of water, phosphoric acid, magnesium sulfate, and sodium chloride. The extracts were then diluted and analyzed using instruments tailored to each specific compound. Recovery tests (n=5 or n=3) on 22 samples, encompassing high-protein, oily, and powdered foods, demonstrated satisfactory recovery rates between 76.6% and 111.6% (RSD: 0.1-6.6%). To validate the method, two concentrations-corresponding to the lower limit of quantification and the maximum permissible level-were added to two or three different samples per additives. This validation was conducted by a single analyst over two parallel runs across five days. The results indicated that the lower limit of quantification achieved trueness of 81.7-102.4%, repeatability of 0.3-6.3%, and within-laboratory reproducibility of 1.0-9.7%. Similarly, for the maximum level of use, trueness ranged from 80.6 to 105.5%, repeatability from 0.4 to 2.8%, and within-laboratory reproducibility from 0.6 to 4.3%, all meeting the target criteria. The developed method proves to be a valuable analytical tool, significantly enhancing the efficiency of food additive analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"66 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.66.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we developed a simultaneous extraction method for 19 food additives, including sweeteners, preservatives, and antioxidants, to enhance testing efficiency across a wide range of processed foods. Samples underwent 2 or 4 extractions with acetonitrile containing 0.05 w/v% ascorbic acid palmitate, facilitated by the addition of water, phosphoric acid, magnesium sulfate, and sodium chloride. The extracts were then diluted and analyzed using instruments tailored to each specific compound. Recovery tests (n=5 or n=3) on 22 samples, encompassing high-protein, oily, and powdered foods, demonstrated satisfactory recovery rates between 76.6% and 111.6% (RSD: 0.1-6.6%). To validate the method, two concentrations-corresponding to the lower limit of quantification and the maximum permissible level-were added to two or three different samples per additives. This validation was conducted by a single analyst over two parallel runs across five days. The results indicated that the lower limit of quantification achieved trueness of 81.7-102.4%, repeatability of 0.3-6.3%, and within-laboratory reproducibility of 1.0-9.7%. Similarly, for the maximum level of use, trueness ranged from 80.6 to 105.5%, repeatability from 0.4 to 2.8%, and within-laboratory reproducibility from 0.6 to 4.3%, all meeting the target criteria. The developed method proves to be a valuable analytical tool, significantly enhancing the efficiency of food additive analysis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信