Predictors of NCLEX-RN Failure in Prelicensure Nursing Students.

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nursing Education Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001391
Meagan Rogers, Cynthia Koomey, Rachael Fontenot
{"title":"Predictors of NCLEX-RN Failure in Prelicensure Nursing Students.","authors":"Meagan Rogers, Cynthia Koomey, Rachael Fontenot","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify predictors of NCLEX-RN® failure and guide nursing program support and resources for at-risk students.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Prelicensure nursing programs have adopted stringent admission and progression policies and often delay student testing based on known predictors of NCLEX-RN success. Students also delay scheduling the exam based on their perceived level of test readiness. There is a gap in the literature associated with predictors of NCLEX-RN failure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective predictive analysis was conducted on 3,396 graduates for the period 2018 through 2022 using demographic characteristics and academic metrics as variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who were men and students with increased lag time to take the NCLEX-RN (>45 days between graduation and initial attempt) were significantly more likely to fail.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing programs using only known predictors of success for admission and progression decisions exclude students who could be successful if given the opportunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47651,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":"143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of NCLEX-RN® failure and guide nursing program support and resources for at-risk students.

Background: Prelicensure nursing programs have adopted stringent admission and progression policies and often delay student testing based on known predictors of NCLEX-RN success. Students also delay scheduling the exam based on their perceived level of test readiness. There is a gap in the literature associated with predictors of NCLEX-RN failure.

Method: A retrospective predictive analysis was conducted on 3,396 graduates for the period 2018 through 2022 using demographic characteristics and academic metrics as variables.

Results: Students who were men and students with increased lag time to take the NCLEX-RN (>45 days between graduation and initial attempt) were significantly more likely to fail.

Conclusion: Nursing programs using only known predictors of success for admission and progression decisions exclude students who could be successful if given the opportunity.

护生NCLEX-RN不合格的预测因素。
目的:本研究的目的是确定NCLEX-RN®失败的预测因素,并为高危学生提供护理计划支持和资源指导。背景:护理执照预备课程采用了严格的入学和升学政策,并且经常根据NCLEX-RN成功的已知预测因素推迟学生的测试。学生们也会根据他们对考试准备程度的感知来推迟考试时间。在与NCLEX-RN失败的预测因素相关的文献中存在空白。方法:以人口统计学特征和学术指标为变量,对2018年至2022年的3396名毕业生进行回顾性预测分析。结果:男性学生和参加NCLEX-RN考试滞后时间较长的学生(从毕业到初次尝试间隔45天)不及格的可能性显著增加。结论:护理课程只使用已知的成功预测因素来决定入学和升学,排除了那些如果有机会就能成功的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Education Perspectives
Nursing Education Perspectives EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A publication of the National League for Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that provides evidence for best practices in nursing education. Through the publication of rigorously designed studies, the journal contributes to the advancement of the science of nursing education. It serves as a forum for research and innovation regarding teaching and learning, curricula, technology, and other issues important to nursing education. Today, as nurse educators strive to advance research in nursing education and break away from established patterns and chart new pathways in nursing education, Nursing Education Perspectives is a vital resource. Nursing Education Perspectives is housed in the NLN Chamberlain College of Nursing for the Advancement of the Science of Nursing Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信