Different effects of emotional valence on overt attention and recognition memory.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
R Gerald Monkman, Leonard Faul, Julia Maybury, Sandry M Garcia, Jane Chung, Haley Echols, Nicole K Koziol, Samantha E Williams, Jessica D Payne, Elizabeth A Kensinger
{"title":"Different effects of emotional valence on overt attention and recognition memory.","authors":"R Gerald Monkman, Leonard Faul, Julia Maybury, Sandry M Garcia, Jane Chung, Haley Echols, Nicole K Koziol, Samantha E Williams, Jessica D Payne, Elizabeth A Kensinger","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2469101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive research has revealed enhanced attention and memory for emotional relative to neutral content. Amongst emotional information, valence effects can also arise: negative information often is preferentially attended and remembered relative to positive information, although the opposite valence effect can also occur. Little research has examined how valence effects in attention relate to valence effects in memory. This is the open question we addressed in this study, by tracking the eye gaze of 53 participants (ages 18-64) while they viewed scenes composed of an emotional (positive or negative) or neutral object superimposed on a neutral context and then tested their memory the next day. Emotional (positive or negative) objects were gazed at longer and recognised better than neutral objects. Amongst the emotional objects, there was a different effect of valence on attention and memory: positive objects were gazed at longer than negative objects while recognition memory was better for negative than positive objects. These valence effects were not modulated by age, and the attentional and mnemonic effects of valence were not correlated. These results suggest a dissociation in the mechanisms supporting valence effects on attention and memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2469101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive research has revealed enhanced attention and memory for emotional relative to neutral content. Amongst emotional information, valence effects can also arise: negative information often is preferentially attended and remembered relative to positive information, although the opposite valence effect can also occur. Little research has examined how valence effects in attention relate to valence effects in memory. This is the open question we addressed in this study, by tracking the eye gaze of 53 participants (ages 18-64) while they viewed scenes composed of an emotional (positive or negative) or neutral object superimposed on a neutral context and then tested their memory the next day. Emotional (positive or negative) objects were gazed at longer and recognised better than neutral objects. Amongst the emotional objects, there was a different effect of valence on attention and memory: positive objects were gazed at longer than negative objects while recognition memory was better for negative than positive objects. These valence effects were not modulated by age, and the attentional and mnemonic effects of valence were not correlated. These results suggest a dissociation in the mechanisms supporting valence effects on attention and memory.

情绪效价对显性注意和识别记忆的不同影响。
广泛的研究表明,相对于中性内容,情绪性内容的注意力和记忆力更强。在情绪信息中,效价效应也会出现:相对于积极信息,消极信息通常更容易被注意和记住,尽管相反的效价效应也会出现。很少有研究考察注意中的效价效应与记忆中的效价效应之间的关系。这是我们在这项研究中解决的开放性问题,当53名参与者(18-64岁)观看由情绪(积极或消极)或中性物体叠加在中性背景上的场景时,我们跟踪他们的目光,然后在第二天测试他们的记忆力。与中性的物体相比,有情绪的(积极的或消极的)物体被注视的时间更长,识别能力更强。在情绪客体中,效价对注意和记忆的影响不同,积极客体的注视时间比消极客体长,消极客体的识别记忆比积极客体好。这些效价效应不受年龄的调节,效价的注意效应和记忆效应不相关。这些结果表明,效价效应对注意和记忆的支持机制存在分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信