Novel Insights into Viewer-Centered Versus Stimulus-Centered Hemispatial Neglect: A Cross-Sectional Behavioral and Imaging Study of Acute Stroke.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Ashley Raman, Andreia V Faria, Michael Colavito, Argye E Hillis
{"title":"Novel Insights into Viewer-Centered Versus Stimulus-Centered Hemispatial Neglect: A Cross-Sectional Behavioral and Imaging Study of Acute Stroke.","authors":"Ashley Raman, Andreia V Faria, Michael Colavito, Argye E Hillis","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15020208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Hemispatial neglect is common after stroke but is often evaluated only after right hemisphere (RH) stroke. We sought to determine the prevalence of two types of neglect, viewer-centered neglect (VCN) and stimulus-centered neglect (SCN), after left hemisphere (LH) and RH strokes. Additionally, we identified lesion load in each vascular territory and areas of hypoperfusion, estimated with FLAIR hyperintense vessels (FVHs) that contribute to neglect. <b>Methods:</b> A series of 233 stroke patients (73 LH and 160 RH) were administered a task to detect VCN and SCN and received brain MRI within 5 days of onset. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify vascular territories where lesion load and/or hypoperfusion contributed to each type of neglect. <b>Results:</b> While VCN was more prevalent after RH stroke, SCN occurred at a similar rate after LH and RH stroke. In RH stroke, lesion load in the middle cerebral artery occipital region and anterior cerebral artery territory and age predicted left VCN, whereas parietal hypoperfusion independently predicted left SCN. In LH stroke, lesion load across regions and age predicted right VCN, while lesion load in posterior cerebral artery occipital and anterior cerebral artery regions, as well as age, predicted right SCN. The addition of information about hypoperfusion improved the prediction of both VCN and SCN. <b>Conclusions:</b> VCN and SCN are each common after RH stroke, and SCN is common after LH stroke. Each type of neglect is accounted for by distinct areas of infarct and hypoperfusion. Results will aid in the detection of neglect after stroke and may guide reperfusion interventions to improve neglect.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hemispatial neglect is common after stroke but is often evaluated only after right hemisphere (RH) stroke. We sought to determine the prevalence of two types of neglect, viewer-centered neglect (VCN) and stimulus-centered neglect (SCN), after left hemisphere (LH) and RH strokes. Additionally, we identified lesion load in each vascular territory and areas of hypoperfusion, estimated with FLAIR hyperintense vessels (FVHs) that contribute to neglect. Methods: A series of 233 stroke patients (73 LH and 160 RH) were administered a task to detect VCN and SCN and received brain MRI within 5 days of onset. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify vascular territories where lesion load and/or hypoperfusion contributed to each type of neglect. Results: While VCN was more prevalent after RH stroke, SCN occurred at a similar rate after LH and RH stroke. In RH stroke, lesion load in the middle cerebral artery occipital region and anterior cerebral artery territory and age predicted left VCN, whereas parietal hypoperfusion independently predicted left SCN. In LH stroke, lesion load across regions and age predicted right VCN, while lesion load in posterior cerebral artery occipital and anterior cerebral artery regions, as well as age, predicted right SCN. The addition of information about hypoperfusion improved the prediction of both VCN and SCN. Conclusions: VCN and SCN are each common after RH stroke, and SCN is common after LH stroke. Each type of neglect is accounted for by distinct areas of infarct and hypoperfusion. Results will aid in the detection of neglect after stroke and may guide reperfusion interventions to improve neglect.

以观众为中心和以刺激为中心的半球忽视的新见解:急性中风的横断面行为和影像学研究。
背景/目的:脑卒中后半球忽视很常见,但通常仅在右半球(RH)卒中后进行评估。我们试图确定两种类型的忽视,观众中心忽视(VCN)和刺激中心忽视(SCN),在左半球(LH)和RH中风后的患病率。此外,我们确定了每个血管区域和灌注不足区域的病变负荷,用FLAIR高血管(FVHs)估计导致忽视。方法:233例脑卒中患者(73例LH和160例RH)在发病5天内接受VCN和SCN检测和脑MRI检查。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定病变负荷和/或灌注不足导致每种类型忽视的血管区域。结果:虽然RH脑卒中后VCN更为普遍,但LH和RH脑卒中后SCN发生率相似。RH脑卒中中,大脑中动脉枕区和大脑前动脉的病变负荷和年龄预测左侧VCN,而顶叶灌注不足独立预测左侧SCN。在LH脑卒中中,跨区域的病变负荷和年龄预测右侧VCN,而大脑后动脉枕动脉和大脑前动脉区域的病变负荷和年龄预测右侧SCN。灌注不足信息的加入提高了VCN和SCN的预测。结论:RH卒中后多发VCN和SCN, LH卒中后多发SCN。每种类型的忽视都是由不同的梗死区域和灌注不足引起的。结果将有助于发现卒中后的忽视,并可能指导再灌注干预以改善忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信