A critical review of artificial intelligence based techniques for automatic prediction of cephalometric landmarks

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
R. Neeraja, L. Jani Anbarasi
{"title":"A critical review of artificial intelligence based techniques for automatic prediction of cephalometric landmarks","authors":"R. Neeraja,&nbsp;L. Jani Anbarasi","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11135-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Automatic cephalometric landmark detection has emerged as a pivotal area of research that combines medical imaging, computer vision, and orthodontics. The identification of cephalometric landmarks is of utmost importance in the field of orthodontics, as it contributes significantly to the process of diagnosing and planning treatments, as well as conducting research on craniofacial aspects. This practice holds the potential to improve clinical decision-making and ultimately increase the outcomes for patients. This work explores a wide range of strategies, encompassing both traditional edge-based methods and advanced deep learning approaches. The study leveraged various academic publication databases like IEEEXplore, ScienceDirect, arXiv, Springer and PubMed to thoroughly search for articles related to automatic cephalometric landmark detection. Additionally, other pertinent publications were acquired from credible sources like Google Scholar and Wiley databases. Screening the articles relied on three selection criteria: (a) publication titles, abstracts, literature reviews, (b) cephalometric radiograph datasets suitable for 2D landmarking, and (c) studies conducted over different time periods were employed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of methodologies used in landmark prediction to identify the most relevant papers for this review. The initial electronic database search identified 268 papers on landmark detection. A total of 118 publications were selected and incorporated in the present study after a meticulous screening process. Performance analysis was conducted on studies that reported Successful Detection Rates (SDRs) within different clinically accepted precision ranges, Mean Radial Error (MRE) with Standard Deviation (SD) between manually annotated and automated landmarks as outcomes. Bar graphs and custom combination plots were utilized to analyse the correlations among different methodologies employed and their evaluation metrics outcomes. The performance comparison results indicate that Deep Learning techniques showed superior accuracy in automating 2D cephalometric landmarks compared to other conventional and Machine Learning approaches. Recently, more advanced Deep Learning algorithms have been developed to improve the accuracy of automatic landmark prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11135-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11135-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic cephalometric landmark detection has emerged as a pivotal area of research that combines medical imaging, computer vision, and orthodontics. The identification of cephalometric landmarks is of utmost importance in the field of orthodontics, as it contributes significantly to the process of diagnosing and planning treatments, as well as conducting research on craniofacial aspects. This practice holds the potential to improve clinical decision-making and ultimately increase the outcomes for patients. This work explores a wide range of strategies, encompassing both traditional edge-based methods and advanced deep learning approaches. The study leveraged various academic publication databases like IEEEXplore, ScienceDirect, arXiv, Springer and PubMed to thoroughly search for articles related to automatic cephalometric landmark detection. Additionally, other pertinent publications were acquired from credible sources like Google Scholar and Wiley databases. Screening the articles relied on three selection criteria: (a) publication titles, abstracts, literature reviews, (b) cephalometric radiograph datasets suitable for 2D landmarking, and (c) studies conducted over different time periods were employed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of methodologies used in landmark prediction to identify the most relevant papers for this review. The initial electronic database search identified 268 papers on landmark detection. A total of 118 publications were selected and incorporated in the present study after a meticulous screening process. Performance analysis was conducted on studies that reported Successful Detection Rates (SDRs) within different clinically accepted precision ranges, Mean Radial Error (MRE) with Standard Deviation (SD) between manually annotated and automated landmarks as outcomes. Bar graphs and custom combination plots were utilized to analyse the correlations among different methodologies employed and their evaluation metrics outcomes. The performance comparison results indicate that Deep Learning techniques showed superior accuracy in automating 2D cephalometric landmarks compared to other conventional and Machine Learning approaches. Recently, more advanced Deep Learning algorithms have been developed to improve the accuracy of automatic landmark prediction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信