Toward a Specific and Descriptive Definition of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A Proposal for Updated Diagnostic Criteria.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hana F Zickgraf, Samuel R Cares, Rachel A Schwartz, Courtney E Breiner, Nicole M Stettler
{"title":"Toward a Specific and Descriptive Definition of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A Proposal for Updated Diagnostic Criteria.","authors":"Hana F Zickgraf, Samuel R Cares, Rachel A Schwartz, Courtney E Breiner, Nicole M Stettler","doi":"10.1002/eat.24383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) have been the source of confusion since its introduction to the DSM in 2013. In the current state, ARFID is diagnosed based on impairment, with no requirement that a specific pattern of behavioral or cognitive/affective symptoms be present. In this paper, we make the case for more positive etiologically based criteria for ARFID wherein Criterion A defines the psychopathology of ARFID. We propose a framework for DSM criteria involving food avoidance that is maintained by beliefs/hedonic reactions that are temporally close to and realistically/functionally associated with a specific food or eating occasion, characterized by one or more of the following expected aversive responses: disgust/distaste, anhedonia/uncomfortable fullness, and acute fear/panic. Our proposed Criterion B retains the four manifestations of impairment in the current definition as necessary, but not sufficient, for the ARFID diagnosis. When both Criteria A and B are met, our revised Criteria D (ARFID vs. other restrictive eating disorders) and E (ARFID vs. other medical/psychiatric conditions) state that ARFID should be diagnosed regardless of co-occurring/comorbid conditions. We discuss how this positive definition of ARFID would impact clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment, with specific considerations for differential diagnosis between ARFID and other eating disorders, other forms of psychopathology, and relevant medical conditions. Additionally, we discuss how it might enhance research opportunities by providing increasingly homogeneous samples through which researchers could better understand the etiological mechanisms of ARFID.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnostic criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) have been the source of confusion since its introduction to the DSM in 2013. In the current state, ARFID is diagnosed based on impairment, with no requirement that a specific pattern of behavioral or cognitive/affective symptoms be present. In this paper, we make the case for more positive etiologically based criteria for ARFID wherein Criterion A defines the psychopathology of ARFID. We propose a framework for DSM criteria involving food avoidance that is maintained by beliefs/hedonic reactions that are temporally close to and realistically/functionally associated with a specific food or eating occasion, characterized by one or more of the following expected aversive responses: disgust/distaste, anhedonia/uncomfortable fullness, and acute fear/panic. Our proposed Criterion B retains the four manifestations of impairment in the current definition as necessary, but not sufficient, for the ARFID diagnosis. When both Criteria A and B are met, our revised Criteria D (ARFID vs. other restrictive eating disorders) and E (ARFID vs. other medical/psychiatric conditions) state that ARFID should be diagnosed regardless of co-occurring/comorbid conditions. We discuss how this positive definition of ARFID would impact clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment, with specific considerations for differential diagnosis between ARFID and other eating disorders, other forms of psychopathology, and relevant medical conditions. Additionally, we discuss how it might enhance research opportunities by providing increasingly homogeneous samples through which researchers could better understand the etiological mechanisms of ARFID.

回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的诊断标准自 2013 年被引入 DSM 以来一直是混乱的根源。在目前的状态下,ARFID 的诊断以损伤为基础,并不要求存在特定的行为或认知/情感症状模式。在本文中,我们提出了基于病因学的更积极的 ARFID 标准,其中标准 A 界定了 ARFID 的精神病理学。我们提出了一个 DSM 标准框架,该框架涉及食物回避,食物回避是由与特定食物或进食场合在时间上接近且在现实/功能上相关的信念/情绪反应维持的,其特征是以下一种或多种预期的厌恶反应:厌恶/反胃、厌食症/不舒适的饱胀感和急性恐惧/惊恐。我们建议的标准 B 保留了当前定义中的四种障碍表现,作为 ARFID 诊断的必要条件,但并非充分条件。当同时满足标准 A 和标准 B 时,我们修订的标准 D(ARFID 与其他限制性进食障碍)和标准 E(ARFID 与其他内科/精神科疾病)规定,无论是否合并/并发症,均应诊断为 ARFID。我们讨论了 ARFID 的这一积极定义将如何影响临床诊断和后续治疗,并具体考虑了 ARFID 与其他进食障碍、其他形式的精神病理学和相关医学症状之间的鉴别诊断。此外,我们还讨论了如何通过提供越来越多的同质样本来增加研究机会,从而使研究人员更好地了解 ARFID 的病因机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信