Ludger Tebartz van Elst, Kimon Runge, Philipp T Meyer, Horst Urbach, Nils Venhoff, Harald Prüss
{"title":"The Neuropsychiatric Checklist for Autoimmune Psychosis: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Ludger Tebartz van Elst, Kimon Runge, Philipp T Meyer, Horst Urbach, Nils Venhoff, Harald Prüss","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.02.889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autoimmune encephalitis is a rapidly evolving topic in both neurology and psychiatry. A recent international consensus paper defined criteria for possible, probable and definite autoimmune psychosis (AP) inspired by the principles established in neurology for the definition of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). This has stimulated much clinical research on AP, but also criticism of the validity of the criteria for possible AP, justifying further clinical investigation such as lumbar puncture. In clinical practice, it is often difficult to decide how far diagnostic procedures such as lumbar punctures and immunotherapies should go in unclear cases. Against this background, this review has three aims: First, we summarize and compare the available concepts for the diagnosis of AP in a systematic literature review. Second, we present an overview of typical specific and non-specific findings that can be obtained in laboratory, electroencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies in the context of AP. Thirdly, we summarize these findings and present the Neuropsychiatric Checklist for AP (NEPCAP) as a tool for clinical assessment of the likelihood of AP, with reference to the typical red flag symptoms and the specific and many unspecific findings that can be identified in additional investigations. We suggest that this instrument might be a useful tool for a comprehensive, possibly uniform and standardized case assessment in the context of possible AP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.02.889","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Autoimmune encephalitis is a rapidly evolving topic in both neurology and psychiatry. A recent international consensus paper defined criteria for possible, probable and definite autoimmune psychosis (AP) inspired by the principles established in neurology for the definition of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). This has stimulated much clinical research on AP, but also criticism of the validity of the criteria for possible AP, justifying further clinical investigation such as lumbar puncture. In clinical practice, it is often difficult to decide how far diagnostic procedures such as lumbar punctures and immunotherapies should go in unclear cases. Against this background, this review has three aims: First, we summarize and compare the available concepts for the diagnosis of AP in a systematic literature review. Second, we present an overview of typical specific and non-specific findings that can be obtained in laboratory, electroencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies in the context of AP. Thirdly, we summarize these findings and present the Neuropsychiatric Checklist for AP (NEPCAP) as a tool for clinical assessment of the likelihood of AP, with reference to the typical red flag symptoms and the specific and many unspecific findings that can be identified in additional investigations. We suggest that this instrument might be a useful tool for a comprehensive, possibly uniform and standardized case assessment in the context of possible AP.
自身免疫性脑炎是神经病学和精神病学中一个迅速发展的课题。受神经病学界定义自身免疫性脑炎(AE)的原则启发,最近一份国际共识文件定义了可能、疑似和确诊自身免疫性精神病(AP)的标准。这激发了许多关于自身免疫性精神病的临床研究,但也有人对可能的自身免疫性精神病标准的有效性提出了批评,认为有必要进行腰椎穿刺等进一步的临床检查。在临床实践中,往往很难决定在不明确的病例中,腰椎穿刺和免疫疗法等诊断程序应走多远。在此背景下,本综述有三个目的:首先,我们通过系统的文献综述总结并比较了现有的 AP 诊断概念。其次,我们概述了实验室、脑电图、磁共振成像、脑脊液和[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描研究在 AP 方面可获得的典型特异性和非特异性发现。第三,我们总结了这些研究结果,并提出了 AP 神经精神检查表(NEPCAP),作为临床评估 AP 可能性的工具,其中参考了典型的红色标志症状以及可在其他检查中发现的特异性和许多非特异性结果。我们认为,该工具可作为一种有用的工具,用于对可能的 AP 进行全面、统一和标准化的病例评估。
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.