River Waste to Goldmine: A Tale of Floating Agriculture in Vulnerable Southern Regions of Bangladesh

IF 4.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mou Rani Sarker, Nanda Dulal Kundu, Md. Hayder Khan Sujan, Md. Salman, Andrew M. McKenzie, Md. Monjurul Islam, Md. Alimur Rahman, Md. Taj Uddin, Humnath Bhandari, Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar
{"title":"River Waste to Goldmine: A Tale of Floating Agriculture in Vulnerable Southern Regions of Bangladesh","authors":"Mou Rani Sarker,&nbsp;Nanda Dulal Kundu,&nbsp;Md. Hayder Khan Sujan,&nbsp;Md. Salman,&nbsp;Andrew M. McKenzie,&nbsp;Md. Monjurul Islam,&nbsp;Md. Alimur Rahman,&nbsp;Md. Taj Uddin,&nbsp;Humnath Bhandari,&nbsp;Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Floating agriculture transforms marshy lands into productive resources, enhancing food security and rural incomes in climate-vulnerable areas. While prior research highlights its potential as a climate-resilient practice, gaps remain in understanding the determinants of adoption and long-term livelihood impacts. Our study addresses these gaps by examining farming procedures, profitability, impacts, and the key drivers and challenges influencing floating agriculture adoption in southern Bangladesh. Data was collected from 158 farmers using a pre-tested questionnaire between October 2018 and April 2019. Profit function and logit regression models were applied to analyze profitability and socio-economic determinants, complemented by qualitative methods and causal loop diagrams to assess impacts. Findings reveal that farmers employ both intercropping and monocropping, with a preference for seedling raising (156.37 USD/100 m<sup>2</sup>) over vegetable cultivation (121.56 USD/100 m<sup>2</sup>) due to higher profitability. Despite its labor-intensive nature (73% labor costs for seedling rising vs. 85% for vegetable cultivation), floating agriculture boosts household income, meets local vegetable demand, and reduces reliance on external markets during shocks. Additionally, it provides ecological benefits such as waterweed management and reduced environmental pollution. Floating agriculture also alleviates poverty by enhancing agricultural production and generating a positive feedback loop of increased income, food availability, and improved nutrition and health. Adoption is influenced by age, experience, family size, income diversity, credit access, extension services, and market proximity. However, high capital costs, limited credit, market volatility, and biotic/abiotic stresses pose challenges. To scale up floating agriculture, policy measures should focus on financial support, technical training, cost-effective innovations, and fostering cooperative farming. Institutional backing is crucial for promoting this sustainable cleaner production practice in flood-prone regions of Bangladesh and similar global contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floating agriculture transforms marshy lands into productive resources, enhancing food security and rural incomes in climate-vulnerable areas. While prior research highlights its potential as a climate-resilient practice, gaps remain in understanding the determinants of adoption and long-term livelihood impacts. Our study addresses these gaps by examining farming procedures, profitability, impacts, and the key drivers and challenges influencing floating agriculture adoption in southern Bangladesh. Data was collected from 158 farmers using a pre-tested questionnaire between October 2018 and April 2019. Profit function and logit regression models were applied to analyze profitability and socio-economic determinants, complemented by qualitative methods and causal loop diagrams to assess impacts. Findings reveal that farmers employ both intercropping and monocropping, with a preference for seedling raising (156.37 USD/100 m2) over vegetable cultivation (121.56 USD/100 m2) due to higher profitability. Despite its labor-intensive nature (73% labor costs for seedling rising vs. 85% for vegetable cultivation), floating agriculture boosts household income, meets local vegetable demand, and reduces reliance on external markets during shocks. Additionally, it provides ecological benefits such as waterweed management and reduced environmental pollution. Floating agriculture also alleviates poverty by enhancing agricultural production and generating a positive feedback loop of increased income, food availability, and improved nutrition and health. Adoption is influenced by age, experience, family size, income diversity, credit access, extension services, and market proximity. However, high capital costs, limited credit, market volatility, and biotic/abiotic stresses pose challenges. To scale up floating agriculture, policy measures should focus on financial support, technical training, cost-effective innovations, and fostering cooperative farming. Institutional backing is crucial for promoting this sustainable cleaner production practice in flood-prone regions of Bangladesh and similar global contexts.

Abstract Image

河流废物到金矿:孟加拉国南部脆弱地区的浮动农业故事
浮动农业将沼泽土地转化为生产性资源,提高了气候脆弱地区的粮食安全和农村收入。虽然先前的研究强调了其作为一种适应气候变化的做法的潜力,但在了解采用的决定因素和长期生计影响方面仍然存在差距。我们的研究通过考察农业程序、盈利能力、影响以及影响孟加拉国南部采用浮动农业的主要驱动因素和挑战,解决了这些差距。在2018年10月至2019年4月期间,使用预测试问卷从158名农民中收集了数据。利润函数和logit回归模型用于分析盈利能力和社会经济决定因素,辅以定性方法和因果循环图来评估影响。研究结果表明,农民采用间作和单作,由于更高的盈利能力,他们更倾向于育苗(156.37美元/100平方米)而不是蔬菜种植(121.56美元/100平方米)。尽管其劳动密集型(种苗劳动成本上升73%,而蔬菜种植劳动成本上升85%),但浮动农业提高了家庭收入,满足了当地蔬菜需求,并在冲击期间减少了对外部市场的依赖。此外,它还提供生态效益,如水草管理和减少环境污染。流动农业还通过提高农业生产和形成增加收入、粮食供应、改善营养和健康的正反馈循环来减轻贫困。收养受年龄、经验、家庭规模、收入多样性、信贷获取、推广服务和市场邻近程度的影响。然而,高昂的资金成本、有限的信贷、市场波动和生物/非生物压力构成了挑战。扩大流动农业,政策措施应侧重于资金支持、技术培训、高性价比创新和培育合作农业。机构支持对于在孟加拉国的洪水易发地区和类似的全球环境中推广这种可持续的清洁生产实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信