A Reconceptualization of Schooling and Teaching: A Renewed Interest in Bildung-Oriented Didaktik and Transactional Realism

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bettina Vogt, Ninni Wahlström
{"title":"A Reconceptualization of Schooling and Teaching: A Renewed Interest in Bildung-Oriented Didaktik and Transactional Realism","authors":"Bettina Vogt,&nbsp;Ninni Wahlström","doi":"10.1111/edth.12687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to contribute to the ongoing scholarly conversation about education through the lenses of the German philosophy of <i>Bildung</i> and the American philosophy of pragmatism. More concretely, in this article, the two philosophies are represented by the traditions of critical-constructive <i>Didaktik</i>, based on Wolfgang Klafki's work, and transactional realism, based on John Dewey's. Against the background of the widespread outcomes-based modes of education today, the authors seek to shed light on the necessary reconceptualization of schooling and teaching and to explore the possibilities for constructive routes forward for curriculum theorizing. They outline the aspects of knowledge and the learning concepts that the two philosophies share and those about which they differ. The authors also analyze the consequences that these similarities and differences have for the educational approaches of critical-constructive <i>Didaktik</i> and transactional realism. Finally, the authors present an empirical example from a Swedish year-eight classroom, drawing conclusions based on their findings and considering corresponding implications about the two traditions' potential to contribute to an understanding of teaching as a pedagogical responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":"75 1","pages":"129-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/edth.12687","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.12687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to contribute to the ongoing scholarly conversation about education through the lenses of the German philosophy of Bildung and the American philosophy of pragmatism. More concretely, in this article, the two philosophies are represented by the traditions of critical-constructive Didaktik, based on Wolfgang Klafki's work, and transactional realism, based on John Dewey's. Against the background of the widespread outcomes-based modes of education today, the authors seek to shed light on the necessary reconceptualization of schooling and teaching and to explore the possibilities for constructive routes forward for curriculum theorizing. They outline the aspects of knowledge and the learning concepts that the two philosophies share and those about which they differ. The authors also analyze the consequences that these similarities and differences have for the educational approaches of critical-constructive Didaktik and transactional realism. Finally, the authors present an empirical example from a Swedish year-eight classroom, drawing conclusions based on their findings and considering corresponding implications about the two traditions' potential to contribute to an understanding of teaching as a pedagogical responsibility.

学校教育和教学的重新概念化:对以培养为导向的Didaktik和交易现实主义的新兴趣
本研究旨在通过德国的教育哲学和美国的实用主义哲学的镜头,为正在进行的关于教育的学术对话做出贡献。更具体地说,在本文中,这两种哲学由基于沃尔夫冈·克拉夫基(Wolfgang Klafki)作品的批判性-建设性Didaktik和基于约翰·杜威(John Dewey)的交易现实主义传统来代表。在今天广泛采用基于结果的教育模式的背景下,作者试图阐明学校教育和教学的必要重新概念化,并探索课程理论化的建设性路线的可能性。它们概述了两种哲学共有的知识和学习概念的各个方面,以及它们不同的方面。作者还分析了这些异同对批判-建设性的迪达克主义和交易现实主义教育方法的影响。最后,作者提出了一个来自瑞典八年级课堂的实证例子,根据他们的发现得出结论,并考虑了两种传统对理解教学作为一种教学责任的潜力的相应影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL THEORY
EDUCATIONAL THEORY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信